The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamic Regulation of Sensorimotor Integration in Human Postural Control
Abstract
Upright stance in humans is inherently unstable, requiring corrective action based on spatial-orientation information from sensory systems. One might logically predict that environments providing access to accurate orientation information from multiple sensory systems would facilitate postural stability. However, we show that, after a period in which access to accurate sensory information was reduced, the restoration of accurate information disrupted postural stability. In eyes-closed trials, proprioceptive information was altered by rotating the support surface in proportion to body sway (support surface “sway-referencing”). When the support surface returned to a level orientation, most subjects developed a transient 1-Hz body sway oscillation that differed significantly from the low-amplitude body sway typically observed during quiet stance. Additional experiments showed further enhancement of the 1-Hz oscillation when the surface transitioned from a sway-referenced to a reverse sway-referenced motion. Oscillatory behavior declined with repetition of trials, suggesting a learning effect. A simple negative feedback-control model of the postural control system predicted the occurrence of this 1-Hz oscillation in conditions where too much corrective torque is generated in proportion to body sway. Model simulations were used to distinguish between two alternative explanations for the excessive corrective torque generation. Simulation results favor an explanation based on the dynamic reweighting of sensory contributions to postural control rather than a load-compensation mechanism that scales torque in proportion to a fixed combination of sensory-orientation information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to Differentiate Balance Deficits
Horak, F. B., Wrisley, D. M., & Frank, J. (2009) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20080071 · Cited by 1,062
Control of human gait stability through foot placement
Bruijn, S. M., & van Dieën, J. H. (2018) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2017.0816 · Cited by 424
Human postural sway results from frequent, ballistic bias impulses by soleus and gastrocnemius
Loram, I. D., Maganaris, C. N., & Lakie, M. (2005) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2004.076307 · Cited by 338
Sensory reweighting dynamics in human postural control
Assländer, L., & Peterka, R. J. (2014) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00669.2013 · Cited by 310
Self-citationMergner, T., Schweigart, G., Maurer, C., & Blümle, A. (2005) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0065-3 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Peterka, R. J., & Loughlin, P. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 410-423
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1988407123
- Cited by
- 624
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 65.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic Regulation of Sensorimotor Integration in Human Postural Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.00516.2003
- The paper
- Peterka, R. J., & Loughlin, P. J. (2004). Dynamic Regulation of Sensorimotor Integration in Human Postural Control. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00516.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.