The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of Execution Noise in Movement Variability
Abstract
The origin of variability in goal-directed movements is not well understood. Variability can originate from several neural processes such as target localization, movement planning, and movement execution. Here we examine variability resulting from noise in movement execution. In several experiments, subjects moved their unseen hand to visual targets, under conditions which were designed to minimize the variability expected from localization and planning processes. We tested short movements in 32 directions in a center-out reaching task. The variability in the movement endpoints and in the initial movement direction varied systematically with the movement direction, with some directions having up to twice the variability of others. In a second experiment we tested four movements in the same direction but with different extents. Here, the longer movements were systematically curved, and the endpoint ellipses were not aligned with the straight line between starting and end position, but they were roughly aligned with the last part of the trajectory. We show that the variability observed in these experiments cannot be explained by planning noise but is well explained by noise in movement execution. A combination of both signal-dependent and signal-independent noise in the amplitude of the motor commands and temporal noise in their duration can explain the observed variability. Our results suggest that, in general, execution noise accounts for at least a large proportion of movement variability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.
Fitts, P. M. (1954) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0055392 · Cited by 6,466
Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination
Todorov, E., & Jordan, M. I. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn963 · Cited by 3,081
Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning
Harris, C. M., & Wolpert, D. M. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/29528 · Cited by 2,498
Self-citationIntegration of Proprioceptive and Visual Position-Information: An Experimentally Supported Model
van Beers, R. J., Sittig, A. C., & Gon, J. J. D. V. D. (1999) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1999.81.3.1355 · Cited by 742
Nakano, E., Imamizu, H., Osu, R., Uno, Y., Gomi, H., Yoshioka, T., & Kawato, M. (1999) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1999.81.5.2140 · Cited by 321
Cited by
Faisal, A. A., Selen, L. P. J., & Wolpert, D. M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2258 · Cited by 2,883
Self-citationA central source of movement variability
Churchland, M. M., Afshar, A., & Shenoy, K. V. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.10.034 · Cited by 393
Temporal Complexity and Heterogeneity of Single-Neuron Activity in Premotor and Motor Cortex
Churchland, M. M., & Shenoy, K. V. (2007) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00095.2007 · Cited by 356
The Role of Ankle Proprioception for Balance Control in relation to Sports Performance and Injury
Han, J., Anson, J., Waddington, G., Adams, R., & Liu, Y. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/842804 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- van Beers, R. J., Haggard, P., & Wolpert, D. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1050-1063
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2133355507
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of Execution Noise in Movement Variability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.00652.2003
- The paper
- van Beers, R. J., Haggard, P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). The Role of Execution Noise in Movement Variability. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00652.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.