Cited by 254Visual perception and processing mechanismsMotor Control and AdaptationVestibular and auditory disorders

What the Brain Stem Tells the Frontal Cortex. II. Role of the SC-MD-FEF Pathway in Corollary Discharge

Open access
Sommer, Marc A., Wurtz, Robert H.·2004·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

One way we keep track of our movements is by monitoring corollary discharges or internal copies of movement commands. This study tested a hypothesis that the pathway from superior colliculus (SC) to mediodorsal thalamus (MD) to frontal eye field (FEF) carries a corollary discharge about saccades made into the contralateral visual field. We inactivated the MD relay node with muscimol in monkeys and measured corollary discharge deficits using a double-step task: two sequential saccades were made to the locations of briefly flashed targets. To make second saccades correctly, monkeys had to internally monitor their first saccades; therefore deficits in the corollary discharge representation of first saccades should disrupt second saccades. We found, first, that monkeys seemed to misjudge the amplitudes of their first saccades; this was revealed by systematic shifts in second saccade end points. Thus corollary discharge accuracy was impaired. Second, monkeys were less able to detect trial-by-trial variations in their first saccades; this was revealed by reduced compensatory changes in second saccade angles. Thus corollary discharge precision also was impaired. Both deficits occurred only when first saccades went into the contralateral visual field. Single-saccade generation was unaffected. Additional deficits occurred in reaction time and overall performance, but these were bilateral. We conclude that the SC-MD-FEF pathway conveys a corollary discharge used for coordinating sequential saccades and possibly for stabilizing vision across saccades. This pathway is the first elucidated in what may be a multilevel chain of corollary discharge circuits extending from the extraocular motoneurons up into cerebral cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00740.2003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Electrophysiological recordings from a transiently inactivated circuit in the brain have shed light on how corollary discharge is used for saccadic sequencing in rhesus monkeys.

    “Electrophysiological recordings from a transiently inactivated circuit in the brain have shed some light on how CD is used for saccadic sequencing in rhesus monkeys62,63,65 (FIG. 6Aa).”

    From Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom (2008) · cites this paper as [63]

  • Corollary discharge has repeatedly been implicated in the process of updating the internal record of the current saccade to facilitate planning the next.

    “CD has repeatedly been implicated in this process59–64.”

    From Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom (2008) · cites this paper as [63]

  • Neurons that connect the midbrain to the prefrontal cortex transmit bursts of action potentials that encode saccadic parameters.

    “Neurons that connect the midbrain to the prefrontal cortex transmit bursts of action potentials that encode saccadic parameters.”

    From Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom (2008) · cites this paper as [63]

  • When the midbrain-to-prefrontal pathway was inactivated by muscimol, behavioural deficits in the simplest saccadic sequencing task were observed.

    “When this pathway was inactivated by muscimol, a GABAA (γ-aminobutyric acid receptor type A) agonist, behavioural deficits in the simplest saccadic sequencing task were observed.”

    From Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom (2008) · cites this paper as [63]

  • The results conformed to the prediction that impairing corollary discharge of the first eye movements would cause incorrect second saccades, revealing a loss of corollary discharge.

    “The results conformed to this prediction, revealing a loss of CD.”

    From Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom (2008) · cites this paper as [63]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 94 · Cited by 254

Authors
Sommer, M. A., & Wurtz, R. H.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2004-03
Volume
91
Issue
3
Pages
1403-1423
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2097579399
Cited by
254
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
corollary discharge, superior colliculus, mediodorsal thalamus, frontal eye field, saccades, contralateral visual field, muscimol inactivation, reaction time
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Stem, Frontal Lobe, Functional Laterality, Macaca mulatta, Microinjections, Motor Neurons, Muscimol, Psychomotor Performance, Saccades, Sleep Stages, Superior Colliculi, Vision, Ocular, Visual Fields, Visual Pathways, GABA Agonists, Mediodorsal Thalamic Nucleus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review