The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opposite Perceptual and Sensorimotor Responses to a Size-Weight Illusion
Abstract
The perceptual size-weight illusion (SWI) occurs when two different-sized objects with equal mass are lifted in sequence: the smaller object is consistently reported to feel heavier than the larger object even after repeated lifting attempts. Here we explored the relationship between sensorimotor and perceptual responses to a SWI in which the smaller of the two target objects in fact weighed slightly less (2.7 N) than the larger object (3.2 N). For 20 consecutive lifts, participants consistently reported that the small-light object felt heavier than the large-heavy object; however, concurrently measured lifting dynamics showed exactly the opposite pattern: peak grip force, peak grip force rate, peak load force, and peak load force rate were all significantly greater for the large-heavy object versus the small-light object. The difference in peak load rate between the two objects was greatest for the initial lift but decreased significantly beyond that point, suggesting that the sensorimotor system used sensory feedback to correct for initial over- and underestimations of object mass. Despite these adjustments to lifting dynamics over the early trials, the difference between the judged heaviness of the two objects did not change. The findings clearly demonstrate that the sensorimotor and perceptual systems utilize distinctly different mechanisms for determining object mass.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Grip and lifting forces are believed to be distinct from the perceptual illusion of felt heaviness in the SWI paradigm [45,47,59].”
From Testing predictive coding theories of autism spectrum disorder using models of active inference (2023) · cites this paper as [59]
Citations
Cites
Separate visual pathways for perception and action
Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8 · Cited by 6,519
Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand
Aglioti, S. M., DeSouza, J. F. X., & Goodale, M. A. (1995) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(95)00133-3 · Cited by 1,100
Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception.
Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., & Nagle, M. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.5.4.692 · Cited by 564
Goodale, M. A., & Westwood, D. A. (2004) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.002 · Cited by 476
Self-citationIndependence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size–weight illusion
Flanagan, J. R., & Beltzner, M. A. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/76701 · Cited by 454
The objects of action and perception
Goodale, M. A., & Humphrey, G. K. (1998) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00017-1 · Cited by 442
Sensory-motor coordination during grasping and manipulative actions
Johansson, R. S., & Cole, K. J. (1992) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0959-4388(92)90139-c · Cited by 436
The formation of finger grip during prehension. A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern
Jeannerod, M. (1986) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0166-4328(86)90008-2 · Cited by 402
Structure and in vivo function of Hsp90
Pearl, L. H., & Prodromou, C. (2000) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(99)00047-0 · Cited by 317
Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception.
Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., et al. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.5.4.692 · Cited by 282
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–119 of 119
Metcalfe, R. W. (2007) · Summit (Simon Fraser University) · Cited by 2
Impact of induction on employee perceptions of health and safety at ArcelorMittal
Samosamo, M. G. (2015) · Cited by 2
Harris, J. W. C., Murphy, M., & Chouinard, P. A. (2025) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-025-02824-x · Cited by 1
Move on up: Fingertip forces and felt heaviness are modulated by the goal of the lift
Buckingham, G., & Donald, H. (2019) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01703-w · Cited by 1
Gonzalez, N., Svenson, O., Ekström, M., Kriström, B., & Nilsson, M. E. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0264830 · Cited by 1
Perceptual and Motor Processes in Motor Imagery
Solomon, J. P., Ng, E., Westwood, D. A., & Boe, S. G. (2025) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.70151 · Cited by 1
Self-citationRelational dynamics inform predictive motor planning and perception
Deeb, A.-R., & Fulvio Domini, A. (2025) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00207.2025 · Cited by 1
Internal Representations for the Generalization of Motor Memories
Brayanov, J. B. (2013) · Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) · Cited by 1
Harris, D., Arthur, T., & Buckingham, G. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/u4ayp · Cited by 1
Salowitz, N. M. G. (2015) · e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) · Cited by 1
Representation of object dynamics for action
Bursztyn, L. L. C. D. (2007) · QSpace (Queen's University Library)
Representing the properties of object classes in manipulation and weight perception
Yak, A. (2011) · QSpace (Queen's University Library)
Infants in Control: Prospective Motor Control and Executive Functions in Action DevelopmentPreprint
Gottwald, J. M. (2018) · Thesis Commons (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/w8suh
van Polanen, V., Tibold, R., Nuruki, A., & Davare, M. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/504563
The brightness-weight correspondence in adults and infants
Wilson, H. (2019) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · doi:10.17635/lancaster/thesis/562
Can Information About Stiffness Perception be Inferred from Action Signals Using Models?
Kossowsky, H., & Nisky, I. (2024) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0495-23.2024
A Wearable Assistive Sleeve for Distributed Load Carrying using a "Finger-Trap" MechanismPreprint
Torres, W. O., & Stuart, H. S. (2025) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.174585730.07705160/v1
Grasping and Lifting Different Materials
Buckingham, G., Cant, J. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2009) · Scholarship@Western (Western University)
Metadata
- Authors
- Grandy, M. S., & Westwood, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3887-3892
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2089596128
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- size-weight illusion, sensorimotor perception, grip force, load force, sensory feedback, motor control
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Illusions, Male, Motor Skills, Muscle Contraction, Stress, Mechanical, Task Performance and Analysis, Weight Perception, Lifting, Muscle, Skeletal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review