Cited by 105Memory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationVestibular and auditory disorders

Both visual and idiothetic cues contribute to head direction cell stability during navigation along complex routes

Open access
Yoder, Ryan M., Clark, Benjamin J., Brown, Joel E., Lamia, Mignon V., Valerio, Stephane, Shinder, Michael E., Taube, Jeffrey S.·2011·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Successful navigation requires a constantly updated neural representation of directional heading, which is conveyed by head direction (HD) cells. The HD signal is predominantly controlled by visual landmarks, but when familiar landmarks are unavailable, self-motion cues are able to control the HD signal via path integration. Previous studies of the relationship between HD cell activity and path integration have been limited to two or more arenas located in the same room, a drawback for interpretation because the same visual cues may have been perceptible across arenas. To address this issue, we tested the relationship between HD cell activity and path integration by recording HD cells while rats navigated within a 14-unit T-maze and in a multiroom maze that consisted of unique arenas that were located in different rooms but connected by a passageway. In the 14-unit T-maze, the HD signal remained relatively stable between the start and goal boxes, with the preferred firing directions usually shifting <45° during maze traversal. In the multiroom maze in light, the preferred firing directions also remained relatively constant between rooms, but with greater variability than in the 14-unit maze. In darkness, HD cell preferred firing directions showed marginally more variability between rooms than in the lighted condition. Overall, the results indicate that self-motion cues are capable of maintaining the HD cell signal in the absence of familiar visual cues, although there are limits to its accuracy. In addition, visual information, even when unfamiliar, can increase the precision of directional perception.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.01041.2010

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yoder, R. M., Clark, B. J., Brown, J. E., Lamia, M. V., Valerio, S., Shinder, M. E., & Taube, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
Corresponding author
Taube, Jeffrey S.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2011-06
Volume
105
Issue
6
Pages
2989-3001
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W1970755914
Cited by
105
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Opus: Research & Creativity (Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (F32DC008481, DC009318, DC008773, R01DC009318, F32DC008773, DC008481)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 053907)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
head direction cells, path integration, self-motion cues, idiothetic cues, visual landmarks, spatial navigation, T-maze, darkness, rats, heading stability
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Brain, Cues, Dark Adaptation, Female, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Space Perception, Spectrum Analysis, Maze Learning, Head Movements, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review