The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neurodynamics of Biased Competition and Cooperation for Attention: A Model With Spiking Neurons
Abstract
Recent neurophysiological experiments have led to a promising “ biased competition hypothesis” of the neural basis of attention. According to this hypothesis, attention appears as a sometimes nonlinear property that results from a top-down biasing effect that influences the competitive and cooperative interactions that work both within cortical areas and between cortical areas. In this paper we describe a detailed dynamical analysis of the synaptic and neuronal spiking mechanisms underlying biased competition. We perform a detailed analysis of the dynamical capabilities of the system by exploring the stationary attractors in the parameter space by a mean-field reduction consistent with the underlying synaptic and spiking dynamics. The nonstationary dynamical behavior, as measured in neuronal recording experiments, is studied by an integrate-and-fire model with realistic dynamics. This elucidates the role of cooperation and competition in the dynamics of biased competition and shows why feedback connections between cortical areas need optimally to be weaker by a factor of about 2.5 than the feedforward connections in an attentional network. We modeled the interaction between top-down attention and bottom-up stimulus contrast effects found neurophysiologically and showed that top-down attentional effects can be explained by external attention inputs biasing neurons to move to different parts of their nonlinear activation functions. Further, it is shown that, although NMDA nonlinear effects may be useful in attention, they are not necessary, with nonlinear effects (which may appear multiplicative) being produced in the way just described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
Selective Attention Gates Visual Processing in the Extrastriate Cortex
Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.4023713 · Cited by 2,433
Kastner, S., Pinsk, M. A., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80734-5 · Cited by 1,622
Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex
Luck, S. J., Chelazzi, L., Hillyard, S. A., & Desimone, R. (1997) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1997.77.1.24 · Cited by 1,615
Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4
Reynolds, J. H., Chelazzi, L., & Desimone, R. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-05-01736.1999 · Cited by 1,236
A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex
Chelazzi, L., Miller, E. K., Duncan, J., & Desimone, R. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/363345a0 · Cited by 1,114
Brunel, N., & Wang, X.-J. (2001) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1023/a:1011204814320 · Cited by 620
Spatial Attention Effects in Macaque Area V4
Connor, C. E., Preddie, D. C., Gallant, J. L., & Van Essen, D. C. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-09-03201.1997 · Cited by 448
Usher, M., & Niebur, E. (1996) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1996.8.4.311 · Cited by 147
Cited by
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Attention, uncertainty, and free-energy
Feldman, H., & Friston, K. J. (2010) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00215 · Cited by 1,365
The Normalization Model of Attention
Reynolds, J. H., & Heeger, D. J. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.002 · Cited by 1,457
The dynamic brain: from spiking neurons to neural masses and cortical fields
Deco, G., Jirsa, V. K., Robinson, P. A., Breakspear, M., & Friston, K. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000092 · Cited by 1,084
Self-citationExpectation (and attention) in visual cognition
Summerfield, C., & Egner, T. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.003 · Cited by 950
Metadata
- Authors
- Deco, G., & Rolls, E. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 295-313
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2165766447
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 9.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurodynamics of Biased Competition and Cooperation for Attention: A Model With Spiking Neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.01095.2004
- The paper
- Deco, G., & Rolls, E. T. (2005). Neurodynamics of Biased Competition and Cooperation for Attention: A Model With Spiking Neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01095.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.