The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistics of Midbrain Dopamine Neuron Spike Trains in the Awake Primate
Abstract
Work in behaving primates indicates that midbrain dopamine neurons encode a prediction error, the difference between an obtained reward and the reward expected. Studies of dopamine action potential timing in the alert and anesthetized rat indicate that dopamine neurons respond in tonic and phasic modes, a distinction that has been less well characterized in the primates. We used spike train models to examine the relationship between the tonic and burst modes of activity in dopamine neurons while monkeys were performing a reinforced visuo-saccadic movement task. We studied spiking activity during four task-related intervals; two of these were intervals during which no task-related events occurred, whereas two were periods marked by task-related phasic activity. We found that dopamine neuron spike trains during the intervals when no events occurred were well described as tonic. Action potentials appeared to be independent, to occur at low frequency, and to be almost equally well described by Gaussian and Poisson-like (gamma) processes. Unlike in the rat, interspike intervals as low as 20 ms were often observed during these presumptively tonic epochs. Having identified these periods of presumptively tonic activity, we were able to quantitatively define phasic modulations (both increases and decreases in activity) during the intervals in which task-related events occurred. This analysis revealed that the phasic modulations of these neurons include both bursting, as has been described previously, and pausing. Together bursts and pauses seemed to provide a continuous, although nonlinear, representation of the theoretically defined reward prediction error of reinforcement learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A neural substrate of prediction and reward
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 · Cited by 9,388
A framework for mesencephalic dopamine systems based on predictive Hebbian learning
Montague, P., Dayan, P., & Sejnowski, T. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-05-01936.1996 · Cited by 2,066
The hippocampal-VTA loop: controlling the entry of information into long-term memory
Lisman, J. E., & Grace, A. A. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.05.002 · Cited by 1,983
Midbrain dopamine neurons encode a quantitative reward prediction error signal
Bayer, H. M., & Glimcher, P. W. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.05.020 · Cited by 1,304
Self-citationFloresco, S. B., West, A. R., Ash, B., Moore, H., & Grace, A. A. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1103 · Cited by 1,106
Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory
Waelti, P., Dickinson, A., & Schultz, W. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35083500 · Cited by 1,018
Responses of monkey dopamine neurons during learning of behavioral reactions
Ljungberg, T., Apicella, P., & Schultz, W. (1992) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1992.67.1.145 · Cited by 987
Dopaminergic modulation of limbic and cortical drive of nucleus accumbens in goal-directed behavior
Goto, Y., & Grace, A. A. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1471 · Cited by 576
Coincident but Distinct Messages of Midbrain Dopamine and Striatal Tonically Active Neurons
Morris, G., Arkadir, D., Nevet, A., Vaadia, E., & Bergman, H. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.06.012 · Cited by 574
Importance of unpredictability for reward responses in primate dopamine neurons
Mirenowicz, J., & Schultz, W. (1994) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1994.72.2.1024 · Cited by 569
Cited by
A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making
Rangel, A., Camerer, C., & Montague, P. R. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2357 · Cited by 2,184
Neuronal Reward and Decision Signals: From Theories to Data
Schultz, W. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00023.2014 · Cited by 1,126
The Neurobiology of Decision: Consensus and Controversy
Kable, J. W., & Glimcher, P. W. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.09.003 · Cited by 928
Self-citationUnderstanding dopamine and reinforcement learning: the dopamine reward prediction error hypothesis
Glimcher, P. W. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1014269108 · Cited by 955
Self-citationHare, T. A., O'Doherty, J., Camerer, C. F., Schultz, W., & Rangel, A. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1309-08.2008 · Cited by 792
Metadata
- Authors
- Bayer, H. M., Lau, B., & Glimcher, P. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1428-1439
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1993866011
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 7.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistics of Midbrain Dopamine Neuron Spike Trains in the Awake Primate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.01140.2006
- The paper
- Bayer, H. M., Lau, B., & Glimcher, P. W. (2007). Statistics of Midbrain Dopamine Neuron Spike Trains in the Awake Primate. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01140.2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.