The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of response properties of deefferented mammalian spindle receptors based on frequency response
Abstract
Sinusoidal responses of primary and secondary endings in deefferented spindles of anesthetized cats were studied over the low-frequency range 0.001-0.1 Hz. Stretch amplitudes were chosen conservatively small (25-100 mum peak-to-peak) so as to lie within the linear region. 1. At 0.1 Hz average sensitivity was 350 pps/mm for primary endings and 80 pps/mm for secondary endings. Sensitivity fell to lower values at lower frequencies, but even at 0.001 Hz, corresponding to 17 min/cycle, sensitivity remained elevated above static values determined with large stretches. Phase lead varied from 5 to 50 degrees and, in the case of primary endings, tended to be greater at lower frequencies. 2. Except for the different scaling factors, the only apparent difference between the frequency responses of primary and secondary endings was a tendency for primary endings to show a greater phase lead over the range 0.001-0.01 Hz. 3. Dynamic responsiveness was assessed theoretically from frequency-response data by calculating responses to ramps at various velocities. Over most of the velocity range dynamic responses were not proportional to velocity. The greater dynamic responsiveness of primary endings during large (6 mm) ramp stretches might be related to frequency response below 0.01 Hz. 4. Certain aspects of dynamic responsiveness to large ramps (6 mm) were accounted for by assuming all phases of responses were attenuated by 25 dB in the case of primary endings and 20 dB in the case of secondary endings. The nonlinearity responsible for attenuation appears to occur at an early stage in the sensory process. 5. Comparison of individual responses to slow ramps with predictions based on linear theory indicated the presence of abrupt departures from linearity for both primary and secondary endings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The mammalian muscle spindle and its central control
Hulliger, M. (1984) · Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/bfb0027694 · Cited by 390
Neural Control of Muscle Length and Tension
Houk, J. C., & Rymer, W. Z. (1981) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010208 · Cited by 272
Self-citationProprioceptive Feedback and Movement Regulation
Prochazka, A. (1996) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp120103 · Cited by 258
Lackner, J. R., & DiZio, P. (1992) · The Head-Neck Sensory Motor System · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195068207.003.0033 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Hasan, Z., & Houk, J. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1975-05-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 663-672
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2278096055
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of response properties of deefferented mammalian spindle receptors based on frequency response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1975.38.3.663
- The paper
- Hasan, Z., & Houk, J. C. (1975). Analysis of response properties of deefferented mammalian spindle receptors based on frequency response. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1975.38.3.663
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.