The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Topography of visual and somatosensory projections to mouse superior colliculus
Abstract
In adult mice of the C57BL/6J strain the projection of the visual field was systematically mapped under direct vision. As in other vertebrate species the nasal (anterior) field projected anterolaterally, and the inferior field posterolaterally. Values of magnification-1 (m-1, or degrees of visual field per millimeter tectal surface) were calculated over most of the tectum, for measurements in the coronal and sagittal planes. Whereas m-1 was fairly constant for measurement pairs in sagittal planes, for coronal planes there was a rather large, elongated, horizontally oriented area in the upper field of vision within which m-1 was smaller than elsewhere. In this area m-1 was anisotropic, with a ratio of almost 2:1 between sagittal and coronal planes. In a previously study we had observed that many cells recorded in deeper tectal layers responded to somatosensory stimulation, with whiskers especially conspicuous. In a given penetration perpendicular to the tectal surface, somatosensory receptive fields recorded in the deeper tectum were always concerned with that group of whiskers or with those parts of the body that crossed the regions of visual field represented in the superficial layers directly above. Given this information on the visual coordinates associated with certain somatosensory fields, the detailed mapping of the visual field onto the tectum made it possible to prepare a map of the somatosensory projection on the tectum. The resulting representation differed markedly from maps described for the classic somatosensory pathway. In the tectum the somatosensory map was dictated by the visual-field projection rather than by the peripheral tactile innervation density. Whiskers were thus featured much more prominently in the tectum, and structures close to the eye, such as the pinna and cheek, receive more representation than the tail or hindpaws.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Central projections of melanopsin‐expressing retinal ganglion cells in the mouse
Hattar, S., Kumar, M., Park, A., Tong, P., Tung, J., Yau, K., & Berson, D. M. (2006) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.20970 · Cited by 996
Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties
Duhamel, J.-R., Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.79.1.126 · Cited by 789
Previc, F. H. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00080018 · Cited by 675
Spatial mapping in the primate sensory projection: Analytic structure and relevance to perception
Schwartz, E. L. (1977) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf01885636 · Cited by 629
Retinal waves coordinate patterned activity throughout the developing visual system
Ackman, J. B., Burbridge, T. J., & Crair, M. C. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11529 · Cited by 525
Metadata
- Authors
- Drager, U. C., & Hubel, D. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1976-01-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-101
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1788332082
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topography of visual and somatosensory projections to mouse superior colliculus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1976.39.1.91
- The paper
- Drager, U. C., & Hubel, D. H. (1976). Topography of visual and somatosensory projections to mouse superior colliculus. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1976.39.1.91
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.