Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Responses to acetylcholine of ganglion cells in an isolated mammalian retina

Masland, R. H., Ames, A.·1976·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. Rabbit retinas were isolated and superfused with a physiological medium. Ganglion cell activity was recorded during stimulation with focused light, and receptive fields were mapped. Receptive fields were identical to those found in vivo and did not change during a 6-h incubation. After the receptive field of a ganglion cell had been identified, acetylcholine or related agents were introduced singly or in combination into the medium, and their effect on the cell's spontaneous and light-evoked activity was observed. 2. Ganglion cells with on-center or directionally selective receptive fields were excited when ACh was added to the medium. The response to exogenous ACh was prevented by cholinergic antagonists. 3. These cells' spontaneous activity and response to light were enhanced by anticholinesterase and depressed by cholinergic antagonists. Antagonists varied in their ability to block the light-evoked response, with dihydro-beta-erythroidine the most effective. 4. Thresholds for ACh or the related agents were low, ranging from 1 to 40 muM; their effects were rapidly and completely reversed when the retina was returned to control medium. 5. In retinas incubated in medium containing 20 mM Mg2+ and 0.2 mM Ca2+, ganglion cells lost completely both their spontaneous and light-evoked activity, but retained their ability to generate action potentials in response to elevated K+. Ganglion cell activity rapidly returned to normal when the retina was returned to medium containing normal electrolytes. On-center and directionally selective cells were excited by ACh in retinas where synaptic transmission had been inhibited by 20 mM Mg2+ and 0.2 mM Ca2+. 6. The responses of on-center and directionally selective cells to ACh, to anticholinesterase, and to cholinergic antagonists in control medium indicate that the retina contains one or more synapses using ACh as a neurotransmitter. The response to ACh in retinas exposed to 20 mM Mg2+ and 0.2 mM Ca2+ suggests that at least one such synapse in on the ganglion cell itself. 7. Off-center cells were inhomogenous in their response to ACh. Although some responded just as the other classes of cell, the majority responded quite weakly and a subgroup was encountered which was entirely unaffected by even 1 mM ACh, by levels of physostigmine which inactivate virtually all retinal acetyl-cholinesterase, or by high concentrations of cholinergic antagonists. Only 2 of 20 off-cells tested in the presence of 20 mM Mg2+ and 0.2 mM Ca2+ were excited by ACh. Apparently ACh is not a primary transmitter for most off-cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1976.39.6.1220

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Masland, R. H., & Ames, A.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1976-11-01
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
1220-1235
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W1495724384
Cited by
254
References
0
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Responses to acetylcholine of ganglion cells in an isolated mammalian retina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1976.39.6.1220
The paper
Masland, R. H., & Ames, A. (1976). Responses to acetylcholine of ganglion cells in an isolated mammalian retina. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1976.39.6.1220

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.