Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Immunocytochemical identification of cone bipolar cells in the rat retina

Euler, Thomas, Wässle, Heinz·1995·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

We studied the morphology of bipolar cells in fixed vertical tissue sections of the rat retina by injecting the cells with Lucifer Yellow and neurobiotin. In addition to the rod bipolar cell, nine different putative cone bipolar cell types were distinguished according to the position of their somata in the inner nuclear layer and the branching pattern and stratification level of their axon terminals in the inner plexiform layer. Some of these bipolar cell populations were labeled immunocytochemically in vertical and horizontal sections using antibodies against the calcium‐binding protein recoverin, the glutamate transporter GLT‐1, the alpha isoform of the protein kinase C, and the Purkinje cell marker L7. These immunocytochemically labeled cell types were characterized in terms of cell density and distribution. We found that rod bipolar cells and GLT‐1‐positive cone bipolar cells occur at higher densities in a small region located in the upper central retina. This area probably corresponds to the central area, which is the region of highest ganglion cell density. A second peak of rod bipolar cell density in the lower temporal periphery matches the retinal area of binocular overlap. The population densities of the immunocytochemically characterized bipolar cells indicate that at least 50% of all bipolar cells are cone bipolar cells. The variety and total number of cone bipolar cells is surprising because the retina of the rat contains 99% rods. Our findings suggest that cone bipolar cells may play a more important role in the visual system of the rat than previously thought. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.903610310

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Euler, T., & Wässle, H.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-10-23
Volume
361
Issue
3
Pages
461-478
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2077516044
Cited by
347
References
67
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunocytochemical identification of cone bipolar cells in the rat retina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.903610310
The paper
Euler, T., & Wässle, H. (1995). Immunocytochemical identification of cone bipolar cells in the rat retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903610310

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.