The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intracellular staining reveals different levels of stratification for on- and off-center ganglion cells in cat retina
Abstract
1. Ganglion cells in the retina of the cat were stained by intracellular dye injection after recording their responses to photic stimulation. 2. All cells encountered were divided into those giving on-responses and those producing off-responses, and the level of dendritic branching of these two groups was compared. Cells giving off-responses were found to branch high in the inner plexiform layer (IPL), near the amacrine cell bodies (sublamina a); those giving on-responses were found to branch lower in the inner plexiform layer (sublamina b). 3. Dye-injected cells varied widely in morphology and size, having cell bodies ranging in diameter from 8 to 32 micrometer and dendritic fields ranging from 25 to 490 micrometer in diameter; yet the sign of the response of each unit correlated only with the level of dendritic branching. Thus, no other morphological feature except stratification appears to be important in determining the sign of the response of these cells. 4. The stratification of ganglion cells into on- and off-layers parallels the distribution of the axon terminals of the flat and invaginating cone bipolars. Flat cone bipolars are in a position to contact off-center ganglion cells (in sublamina a) and invaginating cone bipolars are in a position to contact on-center ganglion cells (in sublamina b). 5. The rod and cone inputs to some cells were characterized by comparing their responses to deep red and blue rod-matched stimuli over a 2-log unit range starting at dark-adapted threshold. About half the cells appeared to be rod dominated under these conditions, whereas the others appeared to have mixed rod and cone signals. 6. The nature of the rod and cone pathways to ganglion cells is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Activity-dependent regulation of dendritic growth and patterning
Wong, R. O. L., & Ghosh, A. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn941 · Cited by 635
Mechanisms underlying development of visual maps and receptive fields
Huberman, A. D., Feller, M. B., & Chapman, B. (2008) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125533 · Cited by 628
Retinal waves and visual system development
Wong, R. O. L. (1999) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.29 · Cited by 544
Design Principles of Insect and Vertebrate Visual Systems
Sanes, J. R., & Zipursky, S. L. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.018 · Cited by 561
Parallel visual pathways: A review
Lennie, P. (1980) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(80)90115-7 · Cited by 509
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, R., Famiglietti, E. V., & Kolb, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1978-03-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 472-483
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1832218041
- Cited by
- 633
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intracellular staining reveals different levels of stratification for on- and off-center ganglion cells in cat retina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1978.41.2.472
- The paper
- Nelson, R., Famiglietti, E. V., & Kolb, H. (1978). Intracellular staining reveals different levels of stratification for on- and off-center ganglion cells in cat retina. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1978.41.2.472
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.