The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of load disturbances during centrally initiated movements
Abstract
1. We have investigated the relative contributions of mechanical and reflex mechanisms in generating the forces produced by the neck muscles when loads were unexpectedly applied during centrally programmed head movements in monkeys. These movements, subserved by muscles well endowed with muscle spindles, are part of the coordinated eye-head response to the appearance of a stimulus in the animal's visual field. Our preparation was a chronically vestibulectomized monkey trained to make a visual discrimination. 2. Two procedures were used to evaluate the torque generated by the neck musculature when an unexpected load disturbance was applied: first, by surgically interrupting the afferent loop subserving the reflex action (section of cervical dorsal roots) and second, by building a mathematical model of the head-neck system and carrying out a process of simulation. 3. Our results indicated that the compensatory torque of reflex origin stimulated by the application of an opposing force was less than 10--30% of that required for perfect compensation, and the larger fraction of the observed compensation was due to the mechanical properties (inertial, viscous, and elastic) of the neck musculature. The combined action of reflex and mechanical processes never completely compensated for the disturbance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle
Rack, P. M. H., & Westbury, D. R. (1969) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008923 · Cited by 1,144
Absence of a stretch reflex in extraocular muscles of the monkey.
Keller, E. L., & Robinson, D. A. (1971) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1971.34.5.908 · Cited by 195
Cited by
Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements.
Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R. A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C. E., & Keith Smith, J. E. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.3.340 · Cited by 1,406
Regulation of soleus muscle stiffness in premammillary cats: intrinsic and reflex components.
Hoffer, J. A., & Andreassen, S. (1981) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1981.45.2.267 · Cited by 616
Winters, J. M., & Stark, L. (1985) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.1985.325498 · Cited by 526
Influence of stimulus parameters on human postural responses
Diener, H. C., Horak, F. B., & Nashner, L. M. (1988) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1988.59.6.1888 · Cited by 359
Neural Control of Muscle Length and Tension
Houk, J. C., & Rymer, W. Z. (1981) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010208 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Bizzi, E., Dev, P., Morasso, P., & Polit, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1978-05-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 542-556
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2166426480
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of load disturbances during centrally initiated movements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1978.41.3.542
- The paper
- Bizzi, E., Dev, P., Morasso, P., & Polit, A. (1978). Effect of load disturbances during centrally initiated movements. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1978.41.3.542
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.