Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 359

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of stimulus parameters on human postural responses

Diener, H. C., Horak, F. B., Nashner, L. M.·1988·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. The role of sensory information in shaping muscle activation patterns to postural perturbations in humans was investigated by varying velocity, amplitude, or duration of the perturbing stimulus. Ten normal subjects were exposed to 120 backward translations of the support surface under conditions of varying velocities (10-35 cm/s, constant amplitude), varying amplitudes (1.2-12 cm, constant velocity), or varying durations (40-800 ms). The effects of perturbation parameters on movement kinematics and EMG latencies, patterns, and integrated areas in six trunk and leg muscles were examined. Integrated EMG activity was normalized across subjects and the early (first 75 ms), middle (second 75 ms), and late (last 350 ms) components were analyzed separately. 2. Ankle, knee, and hip angle trajectories and surface reactive forces suggest that a relatively consistent movement strategy was scaled to the perturbation velocities and amplitudes applied. 3. Short-duration perturbations (75 ms) evoked a single burst of muscle activity (75-100 ms duration) in gastrocnemius, hamstrings, paraspinal, and rectus abdominis muscles at latencies too long to be explained by simple stretch reflexes. EMG latencies, patterns, and integrated areas were independent of the velocity and amplitude of the short-duration perturbations, suggesting a minimal time to incorporate peripheral velocity information into the triggered response. 4. For translations lasting longer than 75 ms, the integrated areas of the early agonist EMG bursts were positively correlated with stimulus velocity. The integrated area of later, more tonic EMG components were best correlated with stimulus amplitude. These relationships were found in both distal (stretched) muscles and in proximal muscles. Absolute latencies (94-145 ms), intersegmental latencies (18-29 ms), and burst durations (75-100 ms) were not influenced by the velocity or amplitude of the stimulus. 5. These results suggest that the spatial and temporal organization of automatic postural responses may be organized independently of response intensity. Within a particular spatial-temporal pattern, the amount of muscle activation appears to be adjusted by sensory information, which specifies velocity and amplitude of the perturbation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1988.59.6.1888

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 359

Metadata

Authors
Diener, H. C., Horak, F. B., & Nashner, L. M.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1988-06-01
Volume
59
Issue
6
Pages
1888-1905
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2291805144
Cited by
359
References
34
FWCI
24.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of stimulus parameters on human postural responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1988.59.6.1888
The paper
Diener, H. C., Horak, F. B., & Nashner, L. M. (1988). Influence of stimulus parameters on human postural responses. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1988.59.6.1888

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.