The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Activity patterns in individual hindlimb primary and secondary muscle spindle afferents during normal movements in unrestrained cats
Abstract
1. Chronically implanted microelectrode wires in the L7 and S1 dorsal root ganglia were used to record unit activity from cat hindlimb primary and secondary muscle spindle afferents. Units could be reliably recorded for several days, permitting comparison of their activity with homonymous muscle EMG and length during a variety of normal, unrestrained movements. 2. The general observation was that among both primary and secondary endings there was a broad range of different patterns of activity depending on the type of muscle involved and the type of movement performed. 3. During walking, the activity of a given spindle primary was usually consistent among similar step cycles. However, the activity was usually poorly correlated with absolute muscle length, apparently unrealted to velocity of muscle stretch, and could change markedly for similar movements performed under different conditions. 4. Spindle activity modulation not apparently related to muscle length changes was assumed to be influenced by fusimotor activity. In certain muscles, this presumption leads to the conclusion that gamma-motoneurons may be activated out of phase with homonymous alpha-motoneurons as well as by more conventional alpha-gamma-motoneuron coactivation. 5. Simultaneous recordings of two spindle primary afferents from extensor digitorum longus indicated that spindles within the same muscle may differ considerably with respect to this presumed gamma-motoneuron drive. 6. Spindle secondary endings appeared to be predominantly passive indicators of muscle length during walking, but could demonstrate apparently strong fusimotor modulation during other motor activities such as postural changes and paw shaking. 7. Both primary and secondary endings were observed to undergo very rapid modulation of firing rates in response to presumed reflexly induced intrafusal contractions. 8. It is suggested that the pattern of fusimotor control of spindles may be tailored to the specific muscle and task being performed, rather than necessarily dominated by rigid alpha-gamma coactivation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Control of Locomotion in Bipeds, Tetrapods, and Fish
Grillner, S. (1981) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010226 · Cited by 1,365
Dynamic Sensorimotor Interactions in Locomotion
Rossignol, S., Dubuc, R., & Gossard, J.-P. (2006) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00028.2005 · Cited by 1,096
Neurobiological Bases of Rhythmic Motor Acts in Vertebrates
Grillner, S. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3975635 · Cited by 1,080
Integration in Spinal Neuronal Systems
Baldissera, F., Hultborn, H., & Illert, M. (1981) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010212 · Cited by 675
Sensorimotor gain control: A basic strategy of motor systems?
Prochazka, A. (1989) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0301-0082(89)90004-x · Cited by 521
Metadata
- Authors
- Loeb, G. E., & Duysens, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1979-03-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 420-440
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2338962757
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activity patterns in individual hindlimb primary and secondary muscle spindle afferents during normal movements in unrestrained cats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1979.42.2.420
- The paper
- Loeb, G. E., & Duysens, J. (1979). Activity patterns in individual hindlimb primary and secondary muscle spindle afferents during normal movements in unrestrained cats. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1979.42.2.420
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.