The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physiological properties of muscle spindles in dorsal neck muscles of the cat
Abstract
1. Single-fiber recording was used to examine the properties of 107 spindle endings in cat biventer cervicis (BC) and complexus (CM) muscles. Responses of receptors were examined following muscle contraction and ramp and hold stretch. Twenty-two endings in splenius (SP) were also examined, but their responses could not be quantitated because the anatomy of SP prevented the application of appropriate stretches. 2. Conduction velocitites of spindle afferents ranged from 13 to 90 m/s. Endings with primary response patterns usually had faster conduction velocities than secondary endings, but there was overlap in the conduction velocity ranges of the two subgroups. 3. Most neck spindle afferents could be classified as either primary or secondary by a constellation of physiological criteria including dynamic response pattern, dynamic index, and variability of resting discharge frequency. However, 22 of 107 endings from BC and CM had responses with characteristics intermediate between primary and secondary responses. The possible sources of these characteristics are discussed. 4. Despite the similarity in properties between spindles of different neck muscles, the length sensitivities of CM spindles were high compared to those of BC spindles. CM spindles showed length-related modulation of firing frequency over a more restricted range of initial muscle lengths than did BC spindles. 5. Eight Golgi tendon organs (GTO) were identified by their characteristics responses. Conduction velocities obtained for five GTO afferent nerves ranged from 50 to 67 m/s. Recordings were also made from receptros in deep muscles surrounding the vertebrae. These receptors had properties characteristic of muscle spindles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The mammalian muscle spindle and its central control
Hulliger, M. (1984) · Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/bfb0027694 · Cited by 390
Proprioceptive Feedback and Movement Regulation
Prochazka, A. (1996) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp120103 · Cited by 258
Roy, J. E., & Cullen, K. E. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3988-03.2004 · Cited by 244
Influences of neck afferents on sympathetic and respiratory nerve activity
Bolton, P. S., Kerman, I. A., Woodring, S. F., & Yates, B. J. (1998) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s0361-9230(98)00094-x · Cited by 59
Proprioceptive Cervicogenic Dizziness: A Narrative Review of Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment
Li, Y., Yang, L., Dai, C., & Peng, B. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11216293 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Richmond, F. J., & Abrahams, V. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1979-03-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 604-617
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2235936685
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiological properties of muscle spindles in dorsal neck muscles of the cat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1979.42.2.604
- The paper
- Richmond, F. J., & Abrahams, V. C. (1979). Physiological properties of muscle spindles in dorsal neck muscles of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1979.42.2.604
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.