The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Deficits in eye movements following frontal eye-field and superior colliculus ablations
Abstract
1. This study investigated the effects of frontal eye-field and superior colliculus ablations on fixation patterns and saccadic eye movements. Monkeys were trained to pick apple pieces out of a multiple-slotted apple board while their heads were fixed. Eye movement records were obtained using predominantly the implanted search-coil method. 2. Both unilateral and bilateral frontal eye-field lesions produced only temporary deficits in eye movements. Following surgery monkeys tended to neglect the contralateral peripheral visual field and made fewer saccades to peripheral targets. Recovery was virtually completed in 2-4 wk. 3. Superior colliculus ablation reduced fixation accuracy, saccade frequency, and saccade velocity. These deficits showed little recovery with time. 4. Paired frontal eye-field and superior colliculus lesions produced dramatic deficits in visually triggered eye movements. Animals could no longer fixate their eyes on visual targets with any degree of accuracy. The range of eye movements was greatly reduced, as was the frequency and velocity of saccades. These deficits showed little recovery with time. 5. These results suggest that visually triggered saccadic eye movements are controlled by two parallel channels, one involving the superior colliculus and the other the frontal eye field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography
Nobre, A. (1997) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/120.3.515 · Cited by 900
Role of frontal eye fields in countermanding saccades: visual, movement, and fixation activity
Hanes, D. P., Patterson, W. F., & Schall, J. D. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.817 · Cited by 492
OCULAR MOTOR DEFICITS IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE: II. CONTROL OF THE SACCADIC AND SMOOTH PURSUIT SYSTEMS
WHITE, O. B., SAINT-CYR, J. A., TOMLINSON, R. D., & SHARPE, J. A. (1983) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/106.3.571 · Cited by 406
Effect of Remote Distractors on Saccade Programming: Evidence for an Extended Fixation Zone
Walker, R., Deubel, H., Schneider, W. X., & Findlay, J. M. (1997) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1997.78.2.1108 · Cited by 366
Present concepts of oculomotor organization
Büttner, U., & Büttner-Ennever, J. A. (2006) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(05)51001-x · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Schiller, P. H., True, S. D., & Conway, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1980-12-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1175-1189
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1825334082
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deficits in eye movements following frontal eye-field and superior colliculus ablations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1980.44.6.1175
- The paper
- Schiller, P. H., True, S. D., & Conway, J. L. (1980). Deficits in eye movements following frontal eye-field and superior colliculus ablations. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1980.44.6.1175
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.