Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 374

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of an experimental arthritis on the sensory properties of fine articular afferent units

Schaible, H. G., Schmidt, R. F.·1985·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

An acute experimental arthritis was induced in the right knee joint of adult cats anesthetized with chloralose, and the activity of single fine afferent units of the medial articular nerve was recorded from filaments of the saphenous nerve. All units included in this study were sensitive to local mechanical probing of the medial and anteromedial aspects of the knee joint. The units were identified by their conduction velocity as belonging either to group III (2.5-20 m/s, 48 U) or group IV (less than 2.5 m/s, 29 U). After the identification, the resting activity was measured, and the evoked activity was determined using local mechanical stimulation with glass rods and von Frey hairs, and passive movements of the knee joint. The results were compared with those obtained in a similar study of fine articular units from normal joints. Resting activity was observed in 75% of the group III and 83% of the group IV units. The discharges were irregular and often of high frequency. Both the percentages of units with resting activity and the frequencies of their discharges were more than twice as high as in the control sample. Nearly all units from inflamed joints had low threshold to movements (group III 89%, group IV 72%), and most units responded well to flexion and extension. In contrast, in units from normal joints only 33% of the group III and 10% of the group IV units responded well to passive movements in the normal working range of the joint. In inflamed as well as in normal joints the responses were mostly tonic in character and adapted slowly or not at all when the joint was held in a new position. In normal joints 24% of the group III and 36.5% of the group IV afferent units with local mechanosensitive receptive fields could not be excited by any physiological or noxious joint movements. Such units were only very occasionally seen in the present sample. The average number of receptive fields per unit found in inflamed joints exceeded considerably that in normal units, but no systematic drop in von Frey thresholds was seen when comparing the control sample with the inflamed one. From the above data we conclude that an acute inflammation sensitizes many fine articular units, making them active at rest and increasing the responsiveness more readily to normally innocuous joint movements. Both nociceptors and units with low threshold to movement seem to become sensitized by the inflammation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1985.54.5.1109

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 374

Metadata

Authors
Schaible, H. G., & Schmidt, R. F.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1985-11-01
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
1109-1122
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2396580394
Cited by
374
References
0
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of an experimental arthritis on the sensory properties of fine articular afferent units. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1985.54.5.1109
The paper
Schaible, H. G., & Schmidt, R. F. (1985). Effects of an experimental arthritis on the sensory properties of fine articular afferent units. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1985.54.5.1109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.