Cited by 924Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and TreatmentPain Management and Placebo Effect

Neuroanatomy of the pain system and of the pathways that modulate pain

Open access
Willis, W. D., Westlund, K. N.·1997·Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

We review many of the recent findings concerning mechanisms and pathways for pain and its modulation, emphasizing sensitization and the modulation of nociceptors and of dorsal horn nociceptive neurons. We describe the organization of several ascending nociceptive pathways, including the spinothalamic, spinomesencephalic, spinoreticular, spinolimbic, spinocervical, and postsynaptic dorsal column pathways in some detail and discuss nociceptive processing in the thalamus and cerebral cortex. Structures involved in the descending analgesia systems, including the periaqueductal gray, locus ceruleus, and parabrachial area, nucleus raphe magnus, reticular formation, anterior pretectal nucleus, thalamus and cerebral cortex, and several components of the limbic system are described and the pathways and neurotransmitters utilized are mentioned. Finally, we speculate on possible fruitful lines of research that might lead to improvements in therapy for pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004691-199701000-00002

Cites

337 of 337 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of multiple ascending pathways with different brain targets and complex modulatory circuitry makes it difficult to identify spinal responses simply with nociception.

    “the presence of multiple ascending pathways with different brain targets [12] and complex modulatory circuitry [89] makes it difficult to identify spinal responses simply with nociception.”
  • None of the regions showing significant cross-classification between pain and rejection are primary pain-processing regions.

    “Critically, none of these regions are primary ‘pain-processing’ regions36,42.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willis, W. D., & Westlund, K. N.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Corresponding author
Willis, W. D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Published
1997-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
2-31
ISSN
0736-0258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998138279
Cited by
924
References
337
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 37
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS032778, P01NS011255)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
pain system, nociception, descending pain modulation, nociceptor sensitization, spinothalamic tract, spinocervical tract, dorsal column pathway, thalamus, cerebral cortex, periaqueductal gray, locus coeruleus, parabrachial area, nucleus raphe magnus, reticular formation, anterior pretectal nucleus, limbic system, neurotransmitters, pain management
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Medulla Oblongata, Neurons, Nociceptors, Pain, Spinal Cord, Spinothalamic Tracts, Thalamus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review