The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single neurons and behavior
Abstract
Neurons in the visual cortex respond selectively to stimulus orientation and spatial frequency. Changes in response amplitudes of these neurons could be the neurophysiological basis of orientation and spatial frequency discrimination. We have estimated the minimum differences in stimulus orientation and spatial frequency that can produce reliable changes in the responses of individual neurons in cat visual cortex. We compare these values with orientation and spatial frequency discrimination thresholds determined behaviorally. Slopes of the tuning functions and response variability determine the minimum orientation and spatial frequency differences that can elicit a reliable response change. These minimum values were obtained from single cells using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The average minimum orientation and spatial frequency differences that could be signaled reliably by cells from our sample were 6.4 degrees (n = 22) and 21.3% (n = 18), respectively. These values are approximately 0.20 of the average full tuning width at one-half height of the cells. Although these average values are well above the behaviorally determined thresholds, the most selective cells signaled orientation and frequency differences of 1.84 degrees and 5.25%, respectively. These values are of the same order of magnitude as the behavioral thresholds. We show that, because of slow fluctuations in a cell's responsivity, ROC analysis overestimates response variability. We estimate that these slow response fluctuations elevated our estimates of single cell “thresholds” by, on average, 30%. Our data point to an approximate correspondence between orientation and spatial frequency discrimination “thresholds” determined behaviorally and those estimated from the most selective single cortical cells. Interpretation of this quantitative correspondence is considered in the discussion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-10-03870.1998 · Cited by 2,178
Noise, neural codes and cortical organization
Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (1994) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0959-4388(94)90059-0 · Cited by 1,252
Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance
Zohary, E., Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/370140a0 · Cited by 1,237
Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision
Newsome, W. T., Britten, K. H., & Movshon, J. A. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/341052a0 · Cited by 1,177
Stimulus onset quenches neural variability: A widespread cortical phenomenon
Churchland, M. M., Yu, B. M., Cunningham, J. P., Sugrue, L. P., Cohen, M. R., Corrado, G. S., Newsome, W. T., Clark, A. M., Hosseini, P., Scott, B. B., et al. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2501 · Cited by 1,084
Metadata
- Authors
- Bradley, A., Skottun, B. C., Ohzawa, I., Sclar, G., & Freeman, R. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1987-03-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 755-772
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1865863485
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single neurons and behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1987.57.3.755
- The paper
- Bradley, A., Skottun, B. C., Ohzawa, I., Sclar, G., & Freeman, R. D. (1987). Visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single neurons and behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1987.57.3.755
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.