Cited by 1,177Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionMultisensory perception and integration

Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision

Newsome, William T., Britten, Kenneth H., Movshon, J. Anthony·1989·Nature

Abstract

The relationship between neuronal activity and psychophysical judgement has long been of interest to students of sensory processing. Previous analyses of this problem have compared the performance of human or animal observers in detection or discrimination tasks with the signals carried by individual neurons, but have been hampered because neuronal and perceptual data were not obtained at the same time and under the same conditions. We have now measured the performance of monkeys and of visual cortical neurons while the animals performed a psychophysical task well matched to the properties of the neurons under study. Here we report that the reliability and sensitivity of most neurons on this task equalled or exceeded that of the monkeys. We therefore suggest that under our conditions, psychophysical judgements could be based on the activity of a relatively small number of neurons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/341052a0

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the random-dot motion direction discrimination task, direction-sensitive neurons in area MT encode the motion stimulus, while the decision process itself occurs downstream of MT, potentially in posterior parietal cortex and/or prefrontal cortex.

    “Extensive physiological and microstimulation studies have shown that while direction-sensititve neurons in the area MT encode the motion stimulus (Newsome et al., 1989; Britten et al., 1992, 1993, 1996), the decision process itself occurs downstream of MT, potentially in the posterior parietal cortex and/or prefrontal cortex.”

    From Decision Making in Recurrent Neuronal Circuits (2008) · cites this paper as Newsome et al., 1989

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newsome, W. T., Britten, K. H., & Movshon, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • New York University (US)
Venue
Nature
Published
1989-09
Volume
341
Issue
6237
Pages
52-54
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2076217198
Cited by
1,177
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 50
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
perceptual decision making, neural correlates, neuronal sensitivity, single-unit recording, monkey visual cortex, sensory processing
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Decision Making, Macaca, Macaca mulatta, Motion Perception, Neurons, Visual Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review