The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effects of contrast on visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single cells and behavior
Abstract
We have compared the effects of contrast on human psychophysical orientation and spatial frequency discrimination thresholds and on the responses of individual neurons in the cat's striate cortex. Contrast has similar effects on orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: as contrast is increased above detection threshold, orientation and spatial frequency discrimination performance improves but reaches maximum levels at quite low contrasts. Further increases in contrast produce no further improvements in discrimination. We measured the effects of contrast on response amplitude, orientation and spatial frequency selectivity, and response variance of neurons in the cat's striate cortex. Orientation and spatial frequency selectivity vary little with contrast. Also, the ratio of response variance to response mean is unaffected by contrast. Although, in many cells, response amplitude increases approximately linearly with log contrast over most of the visible range, some cells show complete or partial saturation of response amplitude at medium contrasts. Therefore, some cells show a clear increase in slope of the orientation and spatial frequency tuning functions with increasing contrast, whereas in others the slopes reach maximum values at medium contrasts. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, we estimated the minimum orientation and spatial frequency differences that can be signaled reliably as a response change by an individual cell. This analysis shows that, on average, the discrimination of orientation or spatial frequency improves with contrast at low contrasts more than at higher contrasts. Using the optimal stimulus for each cell, we estimated the contrast threshold of 48 neurons. Most cells had contrast thresholds below 5%. Thresholds were only slightly higher for nonoptimal stimuli. Therefore, increasing the contrast of sinusoidal gratings above approximately 10% will not produce large increases in the number of responding cells. The observed effects of contrast on the response characteristics of nonsaturating cortical cells do not appear consistent with the psychophysical results. Cells that reach their maximum response at low-to-medium contrasts may account for the contrast independence of psychophysical orientation and spatial frequency discrimination thresholds at medium and high contrasts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, several studies have found good agreement between the population-level responses of gain-modulated neurons (such as the population-average contrast response function) and psychophysical performance (for example, in visual contrast discrimination) in humans and non-human primates12,20–24.”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“Contrast-invariant orientation tuning of cortical neurons for visual stimuli is a well-characterized example of stable encoding of one feature (in this case, orientation), regardless of changes in stimulus context (in this case, contrast)10–12.”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations?
Singer, W. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80821-1 · Cited by 2,581
Visual attention: The past 25 years
Carrasco, M. (2011) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012 · Cited by 2,660
“…range from proposals maintaining that the deployment of attention enhances the signal, to those stating that attention improves sensitivity by reducing external noise, to yet others that purport that the effects are due to observers’ decision criteria and/or reduction in spatial uncertainty.”
BackgroundThe analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance
Britten, K., Shadlen, M., Newsome, W., & Movshon, J. (1992) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.12-12-04745.1992 · Cited by 1,958
Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex
Heeger, D. J. (1992) · Visual Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/s0952523800009640 · Cited by 1,835
Noise, neural codes and cortical organization
Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (1994) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0959-4388(94)90059-0 · Cited by 1,255
Metadata
- Authors
- Skottun, B. C., Bradley, A., Sclar, G., Ohzawa, I., & Freeman, R. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1987-03-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 773-786
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2431484271
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (EY 01175)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- contrast dependence, orientation discrimination, spatial frequency discrimination, primary visual cortex, cat visual cortex, single neuron responses, contrast threshold, orientation selectivity, spatial frequency selectivity, response variance
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cats, Differential Threshold, Discrimination, Psychological, Orientation, Psychophysics, Sensory Thresholds, Space Perception, Visual Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review