Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 508

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms

Langner, G., Schreiner, C. E.·1988·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. Temporal properties of single- and multiple-unit responses were investigated in the inferior colliculus (IC) of the barbiturate-anesthetized cat. Approximately 95% of recording sites were located in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC). Responses to contralateral stimulation with tone bursts and amplitude-modulated tones (100% sinusoidal modulation) were recorded. Five response parameters were determined for neurons at each location: 1) characteristic frequency (CF); 2) onset latency of responses to CF-tones 60 dB above threshold; 3) Q10 dB (CF divided by bandwidth of tuning curve 10 dB above threshold); 4) best modulation frequency for firing rate (rBMF or BMF; amplitude modulation frequency that elicited the highest firing rate); and 5) best modulation frequency for synchronization (sBMF; amplitude modulation frequency that elicited the highest degree of phase-locking to the modulation frequency). 2. Response characteristics for single units and multiple units corresponded closely. A BMF was obtained at almost all recording sites. For units with a similar CF, a range of BMFs was observed. The upper limit of BMF increased approximately proportional to CF/4 up to BMFs as high as 1 kHz. The lower limit of encountered BMFs for a given CF also increased slightly with CF. BMF ranges for single-unit and multiple-unit responses were similar. Twenty-three percent of the responses revealed rBMFs between 10 and 30 Hz, 51% between 30 and 100 Hz, 18% between 100 and 300 Hz, and 8% between 300 and 1000 Hz. 3. For single units with modulation transfer functions of bandpass characteristics, BMFs determined for firing rate and synchronization were similar (r2 = 0.95). 4. Onset latencies for responses to CF tones 60 dB above threshold varied between 4 and 120 ms. Ninety percent of the onset latencies were between 5 and 18 ms. A range of onset latencies was recorded for different neurons with any given CF. The onset response latency of a given unit or unit cluster was significantly correlated with the period of the BMF and the period of the CF (P less than 0.05). 5."Intrinsic oscillations" of short duration, i.e., regularly timed discharges of units in response to stimuli without a corresponding temporal structure, were frequently observed in the ICC. Oscillation intervals were commonly found to be integer multiples of 0.4 ms. Changes of stimulus frequency or intensity had only minor influences on these intrinsic oscillations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1988.60.6.1799

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 508

Metadata

Authors
Langner, G., & Schreiner, C. E.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1988-12-01
Volume
60
Issue
6
Pages
1799-1822
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W164832740
Cited by
508
References
0
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1988.60.6.1799
The paper
Langner, G., & Schreiner, C. E. (1988). Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1988.60.6.1799

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.