Cited by 775Neuroscience and Music PerceptionHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Auditory Brain Stem Response to Complex Sounds: A Tutorial

Open access
Skoe, Erika, Kraus, Nina·2010·Ear & Hearing

Abstract

In Brief This tutorial provides a comprehensive overview of the methodological approach to collecting and analyzing auditory brain stem responses to complex sounds (cABRs). cABRs provide a window into how behaviorally relevant sounds such as speech and music are processed in the brain. Because temporal and spectral characteristics of sounds are preserved in this subcortical response, cABRs can be used to assess specific impairments and enhancements in auditory processing. Notably, subcortical auditory function is neither passive nor hardwired but dynamically interacts with higher-level cognitive processes to refine how sounds are transcribed into neural code. This experience-dependent plasticity, which can occur on a number of time scales (e.g., life-long experience with speech or music, short-term auditory training, on-line auditory processing), helps shape sensory perception. Thus, by being an objective and noninvasive means for examining cognitive function and experience-dependent processes in sensory activity, cABRs have considerable utility in the study of populations where auditory function is of interest (e.g., auditory experts such as musicians, and persons with hearing loss, auditory processing, and language disorders). This tutorial is intended for clinicians and researchers seeking to integrate cABRs into their clinical or research programs. This tutorial provides a comprehensive overview of the methodological approach to collecting and analyzing auditory brain stem responses to complex sounds (cABRs). cABRs provide a window into how behaviorally relevant sounds such as speech and music are processed in the brain. Because temporal and spectral characteristics of sounds are preserved in this subcortical response, cABRs can be used to assess specific impairments and enhancements in auditory processing. Notably, subcortical function is neither passive nor hardwired but dynamically interacts with higher-level cognitive processes to refine how sounds are transcribed into neural code. This experience-dependent plasticity, which can occur on a number of time scales (e.g., life-long experience with speech or music, short-term auditory training, online auditory processing), helps shape sensory perception. Thus, by being an objective and noninvasive means for examining cognitive function and experience-dependent processes in sensory activity, cABRs have considerable utility in the study of populations where auditory function is of interest (e.g., auditory experts such as musicians, persons with hearing loss, auditory processing and language disorders). This tutorial is intended for clinicians and researchers seeking to integrate cABRs into their clinical and/or research programs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aud.0b013e3181cdb272

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Bradlow AR Kraus N Hayes E Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: Sentence perception in noise J Speech Lang Hear Res 2003 46 80 97 12647890
  2. Burkard RF Eggermont JJ Don M Auditory evoked potentials: Basic principles and clinical application 2007 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Philadelphia
  3. Elberling C Don M Burkard RF Eggermont JJ Don M Detecting and assessing synchronous neural activity in the temporal domain (snr, response detection) Auditory evoked potentials: Basic principles and clinical application 2007 102 123 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia
  4. Everest FA ebrary Inc. The master handbook of acoustics 2001 xix, 615 McGraw-Hill New York 4th ed.
  5. Fletcher NH Rossing TD The physics of musical instruments 1991 Springer-Verlag New York
  6. Holmes J Holmes W Speech synthesis and recognition 2002 Taylor & Francis, Inc
  7. Howard DM Angus JAS Acoustics and psychoacoustics 2001 Focal Press Oxford; Boston 2nd ed.
  8. Klatt D Software for cascade/parallel formant synthesizer Journal for the Acoustic Society of America 1976 67 971 975
  9. Krishnan A Burkard RF Eggermont JJ Don M Frequency-following response Auditory evoked potentials: Basic principles and clinical application 2007 313 335 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia
  10. Maddieson I Patterns of sounds 1984 Cambridge University Press Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York
  11. Nunez PL Srinivasan R Electric fields of the brain: The neurophysics of eeg 2006 Oxford University Press Oxford; New York 2nd ed.
  12. Palmer A Shamma S Greenberg S Ainsworth WA Popper AN Fay RR Physiological representations of speech Speech processing in the auditory system, Vol. Springer handbook of auditory research 2004 18 xiv, 476 Springer New York
  13. Porat B A course in digital signal processing 1997 John Wiley New York
  14. Robinson K Patterson RD The stimulus duration required to identify vowels, their octave, and their pitch chroma The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1995 98 1858 1865
  15. Starr A Don M Picton TW Brain potentials evoked by acoustic stimuli Handbook of electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology (revised volume 3). Human event-related potentials 1988 97 157 Elsevier Amsterdam
  16. Thornton ARD Burkard RF Eggermont JJ Don M Instrumentation and recording parameters Auditory evoked potentials: Basic principles and clinical application 2007 42 72 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia
  17. van Drongelen W Signal processing for neuroscientists: Introduction to the analysis of physiological signals 2007 Academic Press Burlington, Mass.
  18. Wallisch P Matlab for neuroscientists: An introduction to scientific computing in matlab 2009 Elsevier/Academic Press Amsterdam; Boston

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skoe, E., & Kraus, N.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Skoe, Erika
Venue
Ear & Hearing
Published
2010-06
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
302-324
ISSN
0196-0202 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037918173
Cited by
775
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 28
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ear and Hearing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01-DC01510, F32DC008052, R01DC001510)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
auditory brainstem response, complex sounds, subcortical auditory processing, experience-dependent plasticity, auditory training, speech processing, music processing, hearing loss, auditory processing disorders, language disorders, musicians
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Auditory Pathways, Education, Medical, Continuing, Hearing Disorders, Humans, Language Disorders, Music, Neuronal Plasticity, Phonetics, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review