Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Memory traces in primate spinal cord produced by operant conditioning of H-reflex

Wolpaw, J. R., Lee, C. L.·1989·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. Study of memory traces in higher animals requires experimental models possessing well-localized and technically accessible memory traces--plasticity responsible for behavioral change, not dependent on control from elsewhere, and open to detailed investigation. Our purpose has been to develop such a model based on the wholly spinal, largely monosynaptic path of the spinal stretch reflex. Previous studies described operant conditioning of this reflex and of its electrical analog, the H-reflex. In this study, we sought to determine whether conditioning causes changes in the spinal cord that affect the reflex and are not dependent on continued supraspinal influence, and thus qualify as memory traces. 2. Sixteen monkeys underwent chronic conditioning of the triceps surae H-reflex. Eight were rewarded for increasing H-reflex amplitude (HR increases mode), and eight were rewarded for decreasing it (HR decreases mode). In each animal, the other leg was an internal control. Over several months of conditioning, H-reflex amplitude in the conditioned leg rose in HR increases animals and fell in HR decreases animals. H-reflex amplitude in the control leg changed little. 3. After HR increases or HR decreases conditioning, each animal was deeply anesthetized and surgically prepared. The reflex response to supramaximal dorsal root stimulation was measured from the triceps surae nerve as percent of response to supramaximal ventral root stimulation, which was the maximum possible response. Data from both legs were collected before and for up to 3 days after thoracic (T9-10) cord transection. The animal remained deeply anesthetized throughout and was killed by overdose. 4. The reflex asymmetries produced by conditioning were still present several days after transection removed supraspinal influence: reflexes of HR increases animals were significantly larger in HR increases legs than in control legs and reflexes of HR decreases animals were significantly smaller in HR decreases legs than in control legs. 5. Reflex amplitude was much greater in the control legs of anesthetized HR decreases animals than in the control legs of anesthetized HR increases animals. 6. Chronic conditioning had at least two effects on the spinal cord. The first effect, task-appropriate reflex asymmetry, was evident both in the awake behaving animal and in the anesthetized transected animal. The second effect, larger control leg reflexes in HR decreases than in HR increases animals, was evident only in the anesthetized animal. By removing supraspinal control, anesthesia and transection revealed a previously hidden effect of conditioning.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1989.61.3.563

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Wolpaw, J. R., & Lee, C. L.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1989-03-01
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
563-572
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2314775367
Cited by
165
References
0
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Memory traces in primate spinal cord produced by operant conditioning of H-reflex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1989.61.3.563
The paper
Wolpaw, J. R., & Lee, C. L. (1989). Memory traces in primate spinal cord produced by operant conditioning of H-reflex. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1989.61.3.563

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.