Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Inferotemporal units in selective visual attention and short-term memory

Fuster, J. M.·1990·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. This research was designed to further clarify how, in the primate, the neurons of the inferotemporal (IT) cortex support the cognitive functions of visually guided behavior. Specifically, the aim was to determine the role of those neurons in 1) selective attention to behaviorally relevant features of the visual environment and 2) retention of those features in temporary memory. Monkeys were trained in a memory task in which they had to discriminate and retain individual features of compound stimuli, each stimulus consisting of a colored disk with a gray symbol in the middle. A trial began with brief presentation of one such stimulus, the sample for the trial. Depending on the symbol in it, the monkey had to memorize the symbol itself or the background color; after 10-20 s of delay (retention period), two compound stimuli appeared, and the animal had to choose the one with the symbol or with the color of the sample. Thus the test required attention to the symbol, in some trials also to the color, and short-term retention of the distinctive feature for each trial, either a symbol or a color. Single-unit activity was recorded from cortex of the IT convexity, lower and upper banks of the superior temporal sulcus (STS), and from striate cortex (V1). Firing frequency was analyzed during intertrial periods and during the entirety of every trial, except for the (match) choice period. 2. In IT cortex, as in V1, many units responded to the sample stimulus. Some responded indiscriminately to all samples, whereas others responded selectively to one of their features, i.e., to one symbol or to one color. Fifteen percent of the IT units were symbol selective and 21% color selective. These neurons appeared capable of extracting individual features from complex stimuli. Some color cells (color-attentive units) responded significantly more to their preferred color when it was relevant (i.e., had to be retained) than when it was not. 3. The latency of IT-unit response to the sample stimulus was, on the average, relatively short in unselective units (mean 159 ms), longer in symbol units (mean 203 ms), and longest in color-attentive units (mean 270 ms). This order of latencies corresponds to the presumed order of participation of those three types of units in the selective attention to the component features of the sample as required by the task. It suggests intervening steps of serial processing before color information reached color-attentive cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1990.64.3.681

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Fuster, J. M.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1990-09-01
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
681-697
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W1901661521
Cited by
269
References
0
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inferotemporal units in selective visual attention and short-term memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1990.64.3.681
The paper
Fuster, J. M. (1990). Inferotemporal units in selective visual attention and short-term memory. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1990.64.3.681

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.