The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inferotemporal units in selective visual attention and short-term memory
Abstract
1. This research was designed to further clarify how, in the primate, the neurons of the inferotemporal (IT) cortex support the cognitive functions of visually guided behavior. Specifically, the aim was to determine the role of those neurons in 1) selective attention to behaviorally relevant features of the visual environment and 2) retention of those features in temporary memory. Monkeys were trained in a memory task in which they had to discriminate and retain individual features of compound stimuli, each stimulus consisting of a colored disk with a gray symbol in the middle. A trial began with brief presentation of one such stimulus, the sample for the trial. Depending on the symbol in it, the monkey had to memorize the symbol itself or the background color; after 10-20 s of delay (retention period), two compound stimuli appeared, and the animal had to choose the one with the symbol or with the color of the sample. Thus the test required attention to the symbol, in some trials also to the color, and short-term retention of the distinctive feature for each trial, either a symbol or a color. Single-unit activity was recorded from cortex of the IT convexity, lower and upper banks of the superior temporal sulcus (STS), and from striate cortex (V1). Firing frequency was analyzed during intertrial periods and during the entirety of every trial, except for the (match) choice period. 2. In IT cortex, as in V1, many units responded to the sample stimulus. Some responded indiscriminately to all samples, whereas others responded selectively to one of their features, i.e., to one symbol or to one color. Fifteen percent of the IT units were symbol selective and 21% color selective. These neurons appeared capable of extracting individual features from complex stimuli. Some color cells (color-attentive units) responded significantly more to their preferred color when it was relevant (i.e., had to be retained) than when it was not. 3. The latency of IT-unit response to the sample stimulus was, on the average, relatively short in unselective units (mean 159 ms), longer in symbol units (mean 203 ms), and longest in color-attentive units (mean 270 ms). This order of latencies corresponds to the presumed order of participation of those three types of units in the selective attention to the component features of the sample as required by the task. It suggests intervening steps of serial processing before color information reached color-attentive cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mesulam, M. (1998) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/121.6.1013 · Cited by 3,072
The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing
Lamme, V. A. F., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01657-x · Cited by 2,338
The hippocampus—what does it do?
Eichenbaum, H., Otto, T., & Cohen, N. J. (1992) · Behavioral and Neural Biology · doi:10.1016/0163-1047(92)90724-i · Cited by 867
Miller, E. K., Lundqvist, M., & Bastos, A. M. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.023 · Cited by 797
Locus coeruleus neurons in monkey are selectively activated by attended cues in a vigilance task
Aston-Jones, G., Rajkowski, J., Kubiak, P., & Alexinsky, T. (1994) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.14-07-04467.1994 · Cited by 637
Cortex and memory: emergence of a new paradigm
Fuster, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21280 · Cited by 559
Self-citationThe Hebbian paradigm reintegrated: local reverberations as internal representations
Amit, D. J. (1995) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00040164 · Cited by 388
Functional connectivity during working memory maintenance
GAZZALEY, A., RISSMAN, J., & D'ESPOSITO, M. (2004) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.4.4.580 · Cited by 337
Neural Suppression of Irrelevant Information Underlies Optimal Working Memory Performance
Zanto, T. P., & Gazzaley, A. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4621-08.2009 · Cited by 302
Gazzaley, A., Rissman, J., Cooney, J., Rutman, A., Seibert, T., Clapp, W., & D'Esposito, M. (2007) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm113 · Cited by 287
A Parametric Approach to Orthographic Processing in the Brain: An fMRI Study
Tagamets, M. A., Novick, J. M., Chalmers, M. L., & Friedman, R. B. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892900562101 · Cited by 224
Variability in neuronal activity in primate cortex during working memory tasks
Shafi, M., Zhou, Y., Quintana, J., Chow, C., Fuster, J., & Bodner, M. (2007) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.12.072 · Cited by 215
Self-citationNeurophysiology of shape processing
Perrett, D. I., & Oram, M. W. (1993) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/0262-8856(93)90011-5 · Cited by 213
Attentional Recruitment of Inter-Areal Recurrent Networks for Selective Gain Control
Hahnloser, R. H. R., Douglas, R. J., & Hepp, K. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/08997660260028665 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuster, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1990-09-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 681-697
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1901661521
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.