Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 603

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Regional cerebral blood flow during voluntary arm and hand movements in human subjects

Colebatch, J. G., Deiber, M. P., Passingham, R. E., Friston, K. J., Frackowiak, R. S.·1991·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was measured using positron emission tomography in six normal volunteers while at rest and while performing four different repetitive movements of the right arm. 2. The four movements were performed in random order and consisted of abduction of the index finger, making a fist, sequential thumb to digit opposition, and shoulder flexion. All the movements were done at the same rate, using an auditory cue and involved displacements through similar amounts of the physiological range at each joint. 3. Increases in rCBF were interpreted as evidence of local neural activation and all four movements were associated with significant increases in CBF in the contralateral sensorimotor and premotor areas and in the supplementary motor area (SMA). 4. The average increase in blood flow in the contralateral sensorimotor cortex was significantly greater for the shoulder movement (31%) than for the three other movements. The increases with finger opposition (21%) and fist-making (24%) were not significantly different, and both were significantly greater than with index finger movement (13%). These data indicate that neither "fractionation" nor distal movement per se cause selective activation of sensorimotor cortex. 5. Significantly greater increases in blood flow in both the contralateral premotor cortex and the SMA ("nonprimary motor areas") occurred with shoulder movement than with the other movements. Because this difference may be related to the significantly greater activation occurring concurrently in the sensorimotor cortex, this finding does not prove unequivocally a "selective" role of the nonprimary motor areas in proximal movement. 6. Neither of the two nonprimary motor areas showed selective activation when a simple sequence of finger movements was performed compared with repetitive contractions of the same fingers. 7. Shoulder movement alone was associated with significant increases in rCBF in the ipsilateral sensorimotor cortex (10%), the superior vermis of the cerebellum (19%), and Brodmann areas 5 and 40 in the contralateral hemisphere. 8. The average location of the center of excitation in the sensorimotor cortex and SMA differed for the four movements and was interpreted as evidence of within-limb somatotopy. The shoulder focus lay highest in the sensorimotor cortex and lowest in the SMA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1991.65.6.1392

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 603

Metadata

Authors
Colebatch, J. G., Deiber, M. P., Passingham, R. E., Friston, K. J., & Frackowiak, R. S.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1991-06-01
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
1392-1401
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W1871190058
Cited by
603
References
0
FWCI
15.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regional cerebral blood flow during voluntary arm and hand movements in human subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1991.65.6.1392
The paper
Colebatch, J. G., Deiber, M. P., Passingham, R. E., Friston, K. J., & Frackowiak, R. S. (1991). Regional cerebral blood flow during voluntary arm and hand movements in human subjects. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1991.65.6.1392

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.