Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Presynaptic dopamine D1 receptors attenuate excitatory and inhibitory limbic inputs to the shell region of the rat nucleus accumbens studied in vitro

Pennartz, C. M., Dolleman-Van der Weel, M. J., Kitai, S. T., Lopes da Silva, F. H.·1992·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. Intracellular recordings were made from the shell region of the nucleus accumbens in an in vitro slice preparation. The mean resting membrane potential, input resistance, and action potential amplitude of these neurons were -76 +/- 1 mV, 87 +/- 5 M omega and 94 +/- 2 mV (N = 108), respectively. A sample of these neurons (N = 18) was identified as medium spiny neurons with the use of the biocytin-avidin labeling technique. 2. Electrical stimulation of the fornix, subcortical fibers, or neuropil within the nucleus accumbens shell itself elicited a depolarizing postsynaptic potential (PSP). Dopamine (10-100 microM) attenuated PSPs elicited by stimulation of all of these sites. In a paired-pulse stimulation protocol, dopamine was observed to enhance the facilitation of the test response with respect to the conditioning response. 3. The suppressive effect of dopamine was mimicked by the D1 receptor agonist SKF 82958 (10-30 microM), whereas the D2 receptor agonist quinpirole (10-30 microM) was ineffective. The action of dopamine was antagonized by the D1 receptor antagonist Sch 23390 (10-30 microM), but not by the D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride (10-50 microM) or various adrenergic receptor antagonists. 4. The PSP was usually composed of an excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP)-inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP) sequence. Dopamine equally attenuated the excitatory and inhibitory component of the synaptic response. The attenuation of both EPSP and IPSP did not depend on membrane potential. 5. Dopamine effects on the resting membrane potential and input resistance were variable and did not correlate with changes in the PSP. Two further indications were found in favor of a presynaptic locus of dopaminergic modulation. First, the time course of the PSP was not altered during dopamine application. Second, dopamine did not attenuate depolarizations induced by bath-applied L-glutamate. In extracellular recordings, it was found that dopamine reduced the population spike but not the presynaptic fiber volley. 6. These findings strongly indicate that dopaminergic modulation of synaptic responses in neurons located in the accumbens shell region is mediated by presynaptic D1 receptors. Notably, dopamine does not exert a purely inhibitory effect on synaptic excitability in the nucleus accumbens, because it suppresses both the excitatory and inhibitory component of the synaptic response.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1992.67.5.1325

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Pennartz, C. M., Dolleman-Van der Weel, M. J., Kitai, S. T., & Lopes da Silva, F. H.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1992-05-01
Volume
67
Issue
5
Pages
1325-1334
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W1936150189
Cited by
187
References
0
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Presynaptic dopamine D1 receptors attenuate excitatory and inhibitory limbic inputs to the shell region of the rat nucleus accumbens studied in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1992.67.5.1325
The paper
Pennartz, C. M., Dolleman-Van der Weel, M. J., Kitai, S. T., & Lopes da Silva, F. H. (1992). Presynaptic dopamine D1 receptors attenuate excitatory and inhibitory limbic inputs to the shell region of the rat nucleus accumbens studied in vitro. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1992.67.5.1325

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.