Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characterization of descending facilitation and inhibition of spinal nociceptive transmission from the nuclei reticularis gigantocellularis and gigantocellularis pars alpha in the rat

Zhuo, M., Gebhart, G. F.·1992·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. Descending influences produced by focal electrical stimulation in the nuclei reticularis gigantocellularis (NGC) and gigantocellularis pars alpha (NGC alpha) on spinal nociceptive transmission and the dorsoventral region of spinal white matter mediating stimulation-produced modulation were examined in pentobarbital sodium-anesthetized, paralyzed rats. Spinal units studied responded to mechanical stimuli and noxious heating (50 degrees C) of cutaneous receptive fields confined to the glabrous skin of the ipsilateral hind foot. Recording sites were located in laminae I-VI of the L3-L5 spinal segments. 2. Electrical stimulation in the NGC or NGC alpha produced both facilitation and inhibition of responses of spinal units to noxious heating of the skin. At 33 of 57 stimulation sites in the NGC and NGC alpha, electrical stimulation produced biphasic effects, facilitating responses at lesser intensities (5-25 microA) and inhibiting responses at greater intensities (50-100 microA). At 21 other sites in the NGC and NGC alpha, electrical stimulation (5-100 microA) only inhibited, and at 3 sites stimulation (5-100 microA) only facilitated responses of spinal units to noxious heating of the skin. 3. Electrical stimulation in the NGC or NGC alpha contralateral to the spinal recording site produced the same magnitude of facilitation/inhibition or inhibition of spinal nociceptive transmission as did stimulation in the ipsilateral NGC and NGC alpha. 4. The latencies to descending facilitation and inhibition of spinal nociceptive transmission from the NGC and NGC alpha were estimated by a cumulative sum technique to be 232 and 80 ms, respectively. 5. Responses of spinal units to graded heating (42-50 degrees C) of the skin exhibited positively accelerating stimulus-response functions (SRF) throughout the temperature range tested. Electrical stimulation at lesser, "facilitating" intensities produced a parallel, leftward shift of the SRF, whereas stimulation at greater, "inhibitory" intensities significantly decreased the slope of the SRF without affecting the threshold for response. 6. To determine whether activation of cell bodies in the NGC or NGC alpha were capable of replicating the effects of electrical stimulation, L-glutamate was microinjected into sites where electrical stimulation facilitated at lesser and inhibited at greater intensities the responses of spinal units to 50 degrees C heating of the skin. L-Glutamate (5 nmol) produced a rapid onset, short-lasting and reproducible facilitation of nociceptive transmission; glutamate microinjection into the same site at a greater dosage (50 nmol) inhibited responses of the same spinal units.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1992.67.6.1599

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Zhuo, M., & Gebhart, G. F.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1992-06-01
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
1599-1614
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2416096195
Cited by
200
References
0
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of descending facilitation and inhibition of spinal nociceptive transmission from the nuclei reticularis gigantocellularis and gigantocellularis pars alpha in the rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1992.67.6.1599
The paper
Zhuo, M., & Gebhart, G. F. (1992). Characterization of descending facilitation and inhibition of spinal nociceptive transmission from the nuclei reticularis gigantocellularis and gigantocellularis pars alpha in the rat. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1992.67.6.1599

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.