Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 374

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Onset of a painful peripheral neuropathy in rat: a partial and differential deafferentation and spontaneous discharge in A beta and A delta primary afferent neurons

Kajander, K. C., Bennett, G. J.·1992·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. The activity of primary afferent axons was recorded in rats that had received a chronic constriction injury (CCI) to the common sciatic nerve. The CCI gives rise to a painful peripheral neuropathy that is characterized by allodynia, hyperalgesia, and, probably, spontaneous pain (or dysesthesia). In the majority of animals, these neuropathic pain symptoms begin 2 days postinjury; sciatic nerve afferents were examined just before and just after the time of symptom onset, at 1 and 3 days postinjury. 2. We used two stimulating electrodes, one proximal to the injury and the other distal, to activate the injured sciatic nerve while we recorded from individual primary afferent axons in microfilaments teased from the L4-L6 dorsal roots. Measurements of conduction velocities (calculated from the proximal electrode) and evaluation of conduction through the site of injury were made from 181 A beta, 135 A delta, and 60 C-fibers. 3. The percentage of axons that did not conduct through the injury site at 1 day postinjury was 85% for the A beta fibers and 55% for the A delta fibers, but only 9% for the C-fibers. By day 3, these percentages had increased to 89% for the A beta fibers, 87% for the A delta fibers, and 32% for the C-fibers. Some axons were activated from the distal stimulating electrode at currents greater than 5–10 times those required from the proximal electrodes, but their distally evoked responses did not have the longer latencies expected from a more distant site of activation. Control experiments confirmed that such high-threshold responses were due to current spread from the distal electrode to a site proximal to the nerve injury. 4. Spontaneous discharges were observed in 35% of A beta fibers, 15% of A delta fibers, and 3% of C-fibers (data from 1 and 3 days postinjury combined). Of the 55 A beta fibers exhibiting spontaneous discharge, 89% did not conduct through the injury site; the same was true of 65% of the A delta fibers (n = 20). Both of the two spontaneously discharging C-fibers conducted through the injury. The frequency of the spontaneous discharge of the myelinated fibers ranged from 10 to 50 Hz and was usually regular or bursting. 5. Intravenous administration of gallamine triethiodide (Flaxedil), a K+ channel blocker, either induced activity in previously silent fibers or increased the frequency of spontaneous activity in 50% (21/42) of A beta fibers and 19% (3/16) of A delta fibers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1992.68.3.734

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 374

Metadata

Authors
Kajander, K. C., & Bennett, G. J.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1992-09-01
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
734-744
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W1764887409
Cited by
374
References
0
FWCI
7.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Onset of a painful peripheral neuropathy in rat: a partial and differential deafferentation and spontaneous discharge in A beta and A delta primary afferent neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1992.68.3.734
The paper
Kajander, K. C., & Bennett, G. J. (1992). Onset of a painful peripheral neuropathy in rat: a partial and differential deafferentation and spontaneous discharge in A beta and A delta primary afferent neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1992.68.3.734

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.