The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PET study of voluntary saccadic eye movements in humans: basal ganglia-thalamocortical system and cingulate cortex involvement
Abstract
1. The purpose of this work was to explore the cortical and subcortical mechanisms underlying the execution of voluntary saccadic eye movements in humans. 2. Normalized regional cerebral blood flow (NrCBF) was measured using positron emission tomography (PET) and H2(15O) bolus intravenous injections in four right-handed healthy volunteers at rest and while performing self-paced voluntary horizontal saccadic eye movements in total darkness. 3. Magnetic resonance imaging of each subject's brain was matched to PET images, allowing the detection of activation in individually defined anatomic regions of interest. Cortical regions were drawn according to gyri limits; subcortical structures were also defined. 4. Self-paced saccadic eye movements elicited bilateral NrCBF increases in the lenticular nuclei, including putamen and globus pallidus, and in the thalamus. At the cortical level, we found bilateral NrCBF increases in the precentral gyrus, the superior part of the median frontal gyrus that corresponds to the supplementary motor area. There was also a significant NrCBF increase in the cerebellar vermis. 5. Right fusiform and lingual gyri, right insula, and left cingulate gyrus were also activated during the execution of saccades. 6. These results indicate that the classical basal ganglia-thalamocortical motor loop previously described for skeletal movements may also be involved in simple saccadic eye movements in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision
Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. R. (2005) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.010 · Cited by 1,986
Circuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans
AUGUSTINE, J. (1996) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(96)00011-2 · Cited by 1,776
A neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions
Morris, J. (1998) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/121.1.47 · Cited by 1,291
Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography
Nobre, A. (1997) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/120.3.515 · Cited by 900
Object and Spatial Visual Working Memory Activate Separate Neural Systems in Human Cortex
Courtney, S. M., Ungerleider, L. G., Keil, K., & Haxby, J. V. (1996) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/6.1.39 · Cited by 891
Metadata
- Authors
- Petit, L., Orssaud, C., Tzourio, N., Salamon, G., Mazoyer, B., & Berthoz, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1993-04-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1009-1017
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2422034847
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PET study of voluntary saccadic eye movements in humans: basal ganglia-thalamocortical system and cingulate cortex involvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1993.69.4.1009
- The paper
- Petit, L., Orssaud, C., Tzourio, N., Salamon, G., Mazoyer, B., & Berthoz, A. (1993). PET study of voluntary saccadic eye movements in humans: basal ganglia-thalamocortical system and cingulate cortex involvement. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1993.69.4.1009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.