Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Noise analysis of miniature IPSCs in adult rat brain slices: properties and modulation of synaptic GABAA receptor channels

De Koninck, Y., Mody, I.·1994·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. The properties of synaptic gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptor channels were resolved by using tight-seal, whole-cell recordings from granule cells of the dentate gyrus in adult rat hippocampal slices and by applying the technique of nonstationary noise analysis to study miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) recorded in the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX), 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX), and D-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (D-AP5). This technique allowed us to extract information about the conductance, the number, and the kinetics of ligand gated channels underlying elementary synaptic currents. 2. To ascertain the validity of the nonstationary noise analysis method we have first tested it on computer simulated mIPSCs with different channel activation, lifetime kinetics, and opening probabilities. Using intraburst mean open times, shorter than the time to the first opening following activation, caused a large variance at the peak due to the stochastic channel properties. This resulted in a skewed mean current-variance relationship, which precluded proper estimation of unit conductance and especially the number of channels open at the peak of mIPSCs. Regardless of the probability of channel opening, accurate estimates of the unit conductance and the number of channels underlying each simulated mIPSC were obtained when channels had mean open times longer than the time to first opening. 3. Once the validity of the nonstationary analysis had been ascertained, it was used on mIPSCs recorded at 35 degrees C. The unit conductance of the synaptic GABAA channels was 28 +/- 1 (SE) pS and the average number of channels underlying mIPSCs was 46 +/- 4. The mean current-variance relationship was not skewed at higher amplitudes, suggesting that the intrinsic variance at the peak of the GABAA mIPSCs is low and that the open time of the channels is longer than the time to first opening. The estimated unit conductance of the channels was constant over a wide range of holding potentials. 4. The amplitude distribution of mIPSCs with rapid 10-90% rise times (290 +/- 20 microseconds) was clearly skewed towards low values. This skew was not due to filtering of electrotonically distant currents. Current-variance analysis revealed that the skewness resulted from differences in the number of GABAA receptor channels and not from the heterogeneity of unitary conductances at various synapses. Selection of mIPSCs with slower rise times yielded smaller unit conductance estimates.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1994.71.4.1318

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
De Koninck, Y., & Mody, I.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1994-04-01
Volume
71
Issue
4
Pages
1318-1335
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2299687596
Cited by
220
References
0
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noise analysis of miniature IPSCs in adult rat brain slices: properties and modulation of synaptic GABAA receptor channels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1994.71.4.1318
The paper
De Koninck, Y., & Mody, I. (1994). Noise analysis of miniature IPSCs in adult rat brain slices: properties and modulation of synaptic GABAA receptor channels. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1994.71.4.1318

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.