Brain stem integration of vocalization: role of the midbrain periaqueductal gray
Abstract
1. The contribution of the midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG) to the central regulation of vocalization was investigated by analyzing the electromyographic (EMG) changes in respiratory, laryngeal, and oral muscles evoked by microinjection of D,L-homocysteic acid (DLH) in the PAG of unanesthetized, precollicular decerebrate cats. Moderate to large (6-40 nmol) doses of DLH evoked natural-sounding vocalization as well as increases in inspiratory depth and respiratory rate. 2. Two basic types of vocalization were evoked, each associated with a distinct and characteristic pattern of respiratory, laryngeal and oral EMG changes. Type A vocalization (voiced sounds such as howl/mew/growl) was characterized by excitation of the cricothyroid (CT) and thyro-arytenoid (TA) muscles, and inhibition of the posterior crico-arytenoid (PCA) muscle, whereas type B vocalization (unvoiced hiss sounds) was characterized by excitation of the PCA and TA muscles and no significant activation of the CT muscle. In addition, stronger expiratory (external oblique, internal oblique, internal intercostal) EMG increases were associated with type A responses, and larger increases in genioglossus and digastric muscle activity were associated with type B responses. 3. Microinjections of small doses of DLH (300 pmol-3 nmol), also evoked patterned changes in muscle activity (usually without audible vocalization) that, although of lower amplitude, were identical to those evoked by injections of moderate to large DLH doses. In no such experiments (175 sites) were individual muscles activated by small dose injections of DLH into the PAG. Further, type A vocalization/muscle patterns were evoked from PAG sites caudal to those at which type B vocalization/muscle patterns were evoked. 4. Considered together these results indicate: that the PAG contains topographically separable groups of neurons that coordinate laryngeal, respiratory, and oral muscle patterns characteristic of two fundamental types of vocalization and that the underlying PAG organization takes the form of a representation of muscle patterns, rather than individual muscles. 5. The patterns of EMG activity evoked by excitation of PAG neurons were strikingly similar to previously reported patterns of EMG activity characteristic of major phonatory categories in higher species, including humans (e.g., vowel phonation, voiceless consonant phonation). These findings raise the possibility that the sound production circuitry of the PAG could well be utilized by cortical and subcortical "language structures" to coordinate basic respiratory and laryngeal motor patterns that are necessary for speech.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Direct projections from the amygdala and limbic forebrain activate specific areas within the LPAG to produce these basic patterns, which control not only limb muscles but also laryngeal muscles resulting in snarling, growling, and howling.
“Direct projections from the amygdala and limbic forebrain activate specific areas within the LPAG to produce these basic patterns, which control not only limb muscles but also laryngeal muscles resulting in snarling, growling, and howling.24,48,49”
From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [49]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Central circuits mediating patterned autonomic activity during active vs. passive emotional coping
Bandler, R., Keay, K. A., Floyd, N., & Price, J. (2000) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s0361-9230(00)00313-0 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
Self-citationPutting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy
Decety, J., & Svetlova, M. (2012) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.003 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Kozlowska, K., Walker, P., McLean, L., & Carrive, P. (2015) · Harvard Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/hrp.0000000000000065 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
“Direct projections from the amygdala and limbic forebrain activate specific areas within the LPAG to produce these basic patterns, which control not only limb muscles but also laryngeal muscles resulting in snarling, growling, and howling.(24,48,49) The LPAG, in turn, activates premotor centers in the pons andmedulla,…”
BackgroundSelf-citationManger, P. R. (2006) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793106007019 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Neural circuits underlying crying and cry responding in mammals
Newman, J. D. (2007) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2007.02.011 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Walker, P., & Carrive, P. (2003) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00744-3 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Self-citationThe effects of group singing on mood
Unwin, M. M., Kenny, D. T., & Davis, P. J. (2002) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/0305735602302004 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Self-citationFaull, O. K., & Pattinson, K. T. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.21749 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Brunelli, S. A., & Hofer, M. A. (2007) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2007.04.014 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Selective Breeding for an Infantile Phenotype (Isolation Calling)
Brunelli, S. A., & Hofer, M. A. (2001) · Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1209-7_12 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, S. P., Davis, P. J., Bandler, R., & Carrive, P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1994-09-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1337-1356
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2408870889
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
- Keywords
- vocalizations, laryngeal muscles, respiratory muscles, cricothyroid muscle, thyroarytenoid muscle, posterior cricoarytenoid muscle, genioglossus muscle
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain Mapping, Brain Stem, Cats, Electromyography, Homocysteine, Laryngeal Muscles, Mouth, Neural Analyzers, Neural Pathways, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Periaqueductal Gray, Respiratory Muscles, Vocalization, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review