The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A novel cholinergic induction of long-term potentiation in rat hippocampus
Abstract
1. We studied long-term cholinergic effects on synaptic transmission in submerged hippocampal slices using intra- and extracellular recording techniques. 2. Bath application of submicromolar concentrations of carbachol (CCh) produced a gradually developing, long-lasting increase in the CA1 excitatory postsynaptic potential and population spike. This potentiation was blocked by atropine and, hence, named muscarinic long-term potentiation (LTPm). Application of DL-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid had no effect on LTPm, indicating that this phenomenon is N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor independent. 3. These effects of CCh were not likely to be due to the blockade of one of several K+ conductances by the drug; the time and concentration dependence of LTPm were different from those associated with cholinergic blockade of K+ conductances. 4. Removal of extracellular calcium (Cao2+) from the bath blocked synaptic transmission. CCh added in calcium-free medium induced LTPm, which was revealed upon removal of the drug by washing with normal calcium-containing medium. Neither cutting CA1-CA3 connections nor cessation of synaptic stimulation interfered with LTPm induction. 5. Application of thapsigargin or H-7 together with CCh blocked LTPm, suggesting the involvement of intracellular calcium (Cai2+) stores and protein kinases, respectively, in the LTPm mechanism. 6. Subthreshold cholinergic stimulation coupled with subthreshold tetanic stimulation caused LTP. CCh had no effect when administered after the LTP mechanism had been saturated by repeated suprathreshold tetani. Tetanic stimulation failed to cause LTP when applied after LTPm had been induced by CCh. These experiments indicate that tetanus-induced potentiation and LTPm share a common mechanism and provide a direct link between ACh and mechanisms of synaptic plasticity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The enhancement of long-term encoding could be at least partially mediated by the cholinergic enhancement of long-term potentiation in the hippocampus (Blitzer et al., 1990; Burgard and Sarvey, 1990; Auerbach and Segal, 1994; Isaac et al., 2009).”
From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as Auerbach and Segal, 1994
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Berridge, M. J. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80510-3 · Cited by 2,200
Making memories last: the synaptic tagging and capture hypothesis
Redondo, R. L., & Morris, R. G. M. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2963 · Cited by 792
Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition
Hasselmo, M. E., & Sarter, M. (2011) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2010.104 · Cited by 733
“The enhancement of long-term encoding could be at least partially mediated by the cholinergic enhancement of long-term potentiation in the hippocampus (Blitzer et al, 1990; Burgard and Sarvey, 1990; Auerbach and Segal, 1994; Isaac et al, 2009).”
BackgroundHuerta, P. T., & Lisman, J. E. (1995) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(95)90094-2 · Cited by 673
“In particular, the cholinergic system that originates in the medial septum and diagonal band of Broca, and innervates the whole hippocampal formation, is known to enhance synaptic plasticity (Ito et al., 1988; Hasselmo and Bower, 1993; Huerta and Lisman, 1993; Auerbach and Segal, 1994).”
The Cholinergic Lesion of Alzheimer's Disease: Pivotal Factor or Side Show?
Mesulam, M. (2004) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.69204 · Cited by 467
Metadata
- Authors
- Auerbach, J. M., & Segal, M.
- Affiliations
- Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
- ORCID
- Segal, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1994-10-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2034-2040
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1959981723
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Keywords
- carbachol, muscarinic receptors, hippocampal CA1, excitatory postsynaptic potentials, population spike, intracellular calcium stores, protein kinases, tetanic stimulation, synaptic transmission
- MeSH terms
- Acetylcholine, Animals, Cholinergic Fibers, Hippocampus, Male, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Receptors, Cholinergic, Synapses, Rats, Wistar, Long-Term Potentiation, Culture Techniques, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review