The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Surround inhibition among projection neurons is weak or nonexistent in the rat neostriatum
Abstract
1. Antidromic activation of striatal spiny projection neurons by substantia nigra stimulation in vivo did not evoke inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) in the antidromically activated neurons, or in neighboring spiny neurons. 2. More generalized activation of projection cells by stimulation of the efferent pathway in slices did not evoke IPSPs in spiny neurons. Inhibitory mechanisms were operative in these slices, as indicated by the presence of an IPSP component in the orthodromic response to local stimulation. 3. Dual intracellular recordings, obtained from cells located within 50–200 microns of each other in striatal slices also failed to demonstrate any inhibition among striatal spiny cells. Spikes triggered in one spiny neuron by current injection failed to produce any postsynaptic potential in nearby spiny cells at resting or depolarized membrane potentials. Excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) evoked by electrical stimulation of the cortex were not affected by spiking of neighboring cells. 4. It is impossible to rule out the presence of inhibition among striatal spiny neurons in all circumstances. However, the absence of demonstrable IPSPs in these experiments argue against the common view that mutual inhibition among spiny neurons is a central organizing principle of striatal function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition.
Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.3.529 · Cited by 2,270
The basal ganglia: a vertebrate solution to the selection problem?
Redgrave, P., Prescott, T. J., & Gurney, K. (1999) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00319-4 · Cited by 1,199
Striatal Plasticity and Basal Ganglia Circuit Function
Kreitzer, A. C., & Malenka, R. C. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.005 · Cited by 1,017
Dopaminergic modulation of neuronal excitability in the striatum and nucleus accumbens
Nicola, S. M., Surmeier, D. J., & Malenka, R. C. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.185 · Cited by 931
Interactions between frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: A computational model
FRANK, M. J., LOUGHRY, B., & O'REILLY, R. C. (2001) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.1.2.137 · Cited by 879
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaeger, D., Kita, H., & Wilson, C. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1994-11-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2555-2558
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1774047354
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surround inhibition among projection neurons is weak or nonexistent in the rat neostriatum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1994.72.5.2555
- The paper
- Jaeger, D., Kita, H., & Wilson, C. J. (1994). Surround inhibition among projection neurons is weak or nonexistent in the rat neostriatum. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1994.72.5.2555
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.