The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brain–behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility
Abstract
1. We measured relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) changes with positron emission tomography and H(2) 15O in six normal subjects repeatedly performing a spatial stimulus-response compatibility task. Subjects had two motor response conditions. They were instructed to respond with the left hand to a left visual field light stimulus and with the right hand to a right visual field light stimulus (compatible condition), and with the right hand to a left visual field light stimulus and with the left hand to a right visual field light stimulus (incompatible condition). Six rCBF measurements per condition were performed in each subject. 2. Reaction times were faster (P < 0.0005) in the compatible (287 ms) than the incompatible (339 ms) condition (spatial stimulus-response compatibility effect). A bilateral increase (P < 0.05) in rCBF in the superior parietal lobule of the two hemispheres was observed during the incompatible condition when compared with the compatible one. No rCBF decreases were observed. Reaction times correlated (P < 0.0001) with the rCBF in the two activated superior parietal lobule areas. 3. Reaction times decreased with practice according to a linear trend (P < 0.05). Practice-related linear rCBF increases (P < 0.05) were observed in the dorsolateral prefrontal, premotor, and primary motor cortex of the left hemisphere. No significant rCBF decreases were observed. 4. Practice did not affect the spatial stimulus-response compatibility effect. A parallel shortening of reaction times was observed in both compatible and incompatible conditions, in both left and right hand responses, and in both left and right visual fields. Accordingly, when rCBF was analyzed, the spatial stimulus-response compatibility by practice interaction did not show any significant activated area. 5. These findings suggest that the two activated areas in the left and right superior parietal lobules subserve the mapping of the visual stimulus spatial attributes onto the motor response spatial attributes and that the rCBF increases in the incompatible response condition represent the more complex computational remapping required when stimuli and response do not match spatially. 6. The dorsolateral prefrontal, premotor, and motor rCBF linear increases in the left hemisphere seem to reflect the effect of practice on cortical processes common to both compatible and incompatible response conditions. These cortical processes presumably strengthen the links between stimuli and responses under different stimulus-response compatibility conditions. The lateralization of the rCBF increases suggests a left hemisphere superiority in these processes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Depending on the task, some studies have reported a general decrease in cortical activity [52–55], a few have reported increases [56–59], and some have reported a more complex redistribution where activity increases in some areas and decreases in others [60–62].”
From Cortical and basal ganglia contributions to habit learning and automaticity (2010) · cites this paper as [59]
Citations
Cites
Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences
Stevens, J. P. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203843130 · Cited by 10,652
Rozeboom, W. W., Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R., & Birnbaum, A. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162101 · Cited by 8,012
Separate visual pathways for perception and action
Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8 · Cited by 6,519
Attention and the detection of signals.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160 · Cited by 3,778
(1982) · Cited by 3,737
Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory
Mesulam, M. (1990) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410280502 · Cited by 2,684
Cellular basis of working memory
Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1995) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(95)90304-6 · Cited by 2,663
Taussig, M. (1991) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203397244 · Cited by 2,403
Circuitry of Primate Prefrontal Cortex and Regulation of Behavior by Representational Memory
Goldman‐Rakic, P. S. (1987) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010509 · Cited by 1,960
Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umilta, C. (1987) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(87)90041-8 · Cited by 1,954
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–135 of 135
Schütz, C., & Schack, T. (2019) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-019-05652-6 · Cited by 7
Selective Maintenance of Motor Performance in Older Adults From Long-Lasting Sport Practice
Dascal, J. B., & Teixeira, L. A. (2016) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2016.1188195 · Cited by 9
Gibbs, R. W. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805844.006 · Cited by 7
Takahashi, M., & Ikegami, M. (2008) · Neuropsychobiology · doi:10.1159/000159773 · Cited by 6
Zillekens, I. C., Schliephake, L., Brandi, M., & Schilbach, L. (2019) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsz071 · Cited by 6
Schizophrenia in the 21st Century
Burne, T. H. J. (2012) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/1669 · Cited by 5
Effect of bilingualism on visual tracking attention and resistance to distraction
Janić, A., Cavanagh, P., & Rivest, J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-71185-6 · Cited by 4
Influence of reading habits on cerebral plasticity for discourse comprehension in aging
Martin, C.-O., Desrochers, M., Demers, C., Scherer, L. C., & Ska, B. (2012) · Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language Literatures in English and Cultural Studies · doi:10.5007/2175-8026.2012n63p101 · Cited by 4
Fatima, Z., & McIntosh, A. R. (2011) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2745-5 · Cited by 4
A Dynamical Framework for Human Skill Learning
Magne, C., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2008) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)10017-6 · Cited by 3
van Ruitenbeek, P., Vermeeren, A., Mehta, M. A., Drexler, E. I., & Riedel, W. J. (2013) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22387 · Cited by 3
Rapidly induced changes in neuromagnetic fields following repetitive hand movements
Woldag, H., Waldmann, G., Knösche, T. R., Maeß, B., Friederici, A. D., & Hummelsheim, H. (2006) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01361.x · Cited by 3
Gibbs, R. W. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805844.001 · Cited by 2
Sequential motor skill : cognition, perception and action
Ruitenberg, M. F. L. (2013) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036535373 · Cited by 1
Theorin, A. (2009) · DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) · Cited by 1
Neural Plasticity: Influencing Elements and Modulation Techniques
Li, K., & Boakye, M. (2011) · Journal of Neurology & Neurophysiology · doi:10.4172/2155-9562.s4-003 · Cited by 1
Waves of Endogenous Context: Behavior and Imaging
Iacoboni, M., Eran Zaidel, B., Sicotte, N. L., Woods, R. P., Cohen, M. S., & Mazziotta, J. C. (1998) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(18)31786-5 · Cited by 1
Directions in Research into Response Selection Slowing in Schizophrenia
McAllindon, D. P., & Tibbo, P. G. (2012) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/37183
Vision assisted system for industrial robot training
Sang, T. (2009) · cIRcle (University of British Columbia) · doi:10.14288/1.0080747
FEATURE ARTICLE Human Functional Neuroimaging of Brain Changes Associated with Practice
Kelly, C. A. M., & Garavan, H. (2005)
Do developmental changes in inhibitory ability underpin developmental changes in intelligence
Michel, F. (2006) · UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)
Imagery, Memory, and Reasoning
Gibbs, R. W. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805844.005
Gibbs, R. W. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805844.009 · Cited by 1
Neural and Psychological Mechanisms of Interference Control.
Nee, D. E. (2008)
Gibbs, R. W. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805844.003
Shulman, G. L., McAvoy, M. P., Cowan, M. C., Astafiev, S. V., Mitchell, J. P., Ruff, C. C., Bestmann, S., Blankenburg, F., Bjoertomt, O., Josephs, O., et al. (2008)
Gibbs, R. W. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805844.002
Effects of Age and Motor Training on Prefrontal-motor Cortical Excitability
Lam, S. (2015) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Gibbs, R. W. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805844.004
Fuster, J. M. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407815-4.00007-6
(2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805844.010
(2006) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203022795.bmatt
Faculty Opinions recommendation of How a lateralized brain supports symmetrical bimanual tasks.
Shadmehr, R. (2006) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.1032786.374467
Putois, B. (2009) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/6d5e9a6az903az4feaz989dzf9fb01f6400c
Friedman (2000) · doi:10.1002/1097-0029(20001001)51:1
Metadata
- Authors
- Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., & Mazziotta, J. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1996-07-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 321-331
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2160734434
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5k08ns001646-05)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1K08 NS01646-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Free Will and Agency
- Keywords
- spatial stimulus-response compatibility, practice effects, relative cerebral blood flow, superior parietal lobule, reaction time, hemispheric lateralization, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, premotor cortex, primary motor cortex, stimulus-response mapping, cognitive control, brain-behavior relationship
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Reference Values, Spatial Behavior, Tomography, Emission-Computed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
