The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional and Pharmacological Differences Between Recombinant N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptors
Abstract
Vicini, Stefano, Jian Feng Wang, Jin Hong Li, Wei Jian Zhu, Yue Hua Wang, Jian Hong Luo, Barry B. Wolfe, and Dennis R. Grayson. Functional and pharmacological differences between recombinant N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 555–566, 1998. N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors transiently transfected into mammalian HEK-293 cells were characterized with subunit-specific antibodies and electrophysiological recordings. Deactivation time course recorded in response to fastl-glutamate pulses were studied in isolated and lifted cells, as well as in outside-out membrane patches excised from cells expressing recombinant NR1 subunits in combination with the NR2A, NR2B, NR2C, or NR2D NMDA receptor subunits. Transfected cells were preidentified by the fluorescence emitted from the coexpressed Aequorea victoria jellyfish Green Lantern protein. Currents generated by NR1/NR2A channels displayed double exponential deactivation time course being faster than that in NR1/NR2B or NR1/NR2C channels. However, a large decay variability was observed within each cotransfection, suggesting that mechanisms additional to subunit composition may also regulate deactivation time course. NR1/NR2D channels displayed slowly deactivating currents. Channel deactivation was fast and comparable among receptors obtained by cotransfecting five distinct spliced variants of the NR1 subunit, each with the NR2A subunit. Additionally, recovery from desensitization was slower for NR1/NR2B than for NR1/NR2A channels. The average deactivation time course of responses to brief l-glutamate applications in cells where NR1/NR2A/NR2B cDNAs were cotransfected at variable ratio was intermediate between those of the NR1/NR2A and NR1/NR2B channels. Although immunocytochemical evidence indicates that the majority of cells are cotransfected by all plasmids in triple transfection, our experimental condition did not allow for a tight control of the expression of NMDA receptor subunits. This produced the result that many cells were characterized by deactivation time course and haloperidol sensitivities of separate NR1/NR2A and NR1/NR2B subunit heteromers. We also speculate on the possible formation of channels resulting from the coassembly in the same receptor of NR1/NR2A/NR2B subunits from a minority of cells that gave responses to brief application of l-glutamate characterized by slow deactivation time course and decreased haloperidol sensitivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monyer, H., Burnashev, N., Laurie, D. J., Sakmann, B., & Seeburg, P. H. (1994) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(94)90210-0 · Cited by 3,535
Changing subunit composition of heteromeric NMDA receptors during development of rat cortex
Sheng, M., Cummings, J., Roldan, L. A., Jan, Y. N., & Jan, L. Y. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/368144a0 · Cited by 1,377
Cited by
Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels: Structure, Regulation, and Function
Traynelis, S. F., Wollmuth, L. P., McBain, C. J., Menniti, F. S., Vance, K. M., Ogden, K. K., Hansen, K. B., Yuan, H., Myers, S. J., & Dingledine, R. (2010) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.109.002451 · Cited by 3,568
The Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels
Dingledine, R., Borges, K., Bowie, D., & Traynelis, S. F. (1999) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01394-2 · Cited by 3,554
NMDA receptor subunit diversity: impact on receptor properties, synaptic plasticity and disease
Paoletti, P., Bellone, C., & Zhou, Q. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3504 · Cited by 2,523
NMDA receptor subunits: diversity, development and disease
Cull-Candy, S., Brickley, S., & Farrant, M. (2001) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00215-4 · Cited by 1,694
The Postsynaptic Architecture of Excitatory Synapses: A More Quantitative View
Sheng, M., & Hoogenraad, C. C. (2007) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.060805.160029 · Cited by 1,003
Metadata
- Authors
- Vicini, S., Wang, J. F., Li, J. H., Zhu, W. J., Wang, Y. H., Luo, J. H., Wolfe, B. B., & Grayson, D. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1998-02-01
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 555-566
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1483876599
- Cited by
- 674
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional and Pharmacological Differences Between Recombinant N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.555
- The paper
- Vicini, S., Wang, J. F., Li, J. H., Zhu, W. J., Wang, Y. H., Luo, J. H., Wolfe, B. B., & Grayson, D. R. (1998). Functional and Pharmacological Differences Between Recombinant N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptors. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.555
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.