The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motor-Unit Synchronization Increases EMG Amplitude and Decreases Force Steadiness of Simulated Contractions
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of motor-unit synchronization on the surface electromyogram (EMG) and isometric force using a computer model of muscle contraction. The EMG and force were simulated by generating muscle fiber action potentials, defining motor-unit mechanical characteristics and territories, estimating motor-unit action potentials, specifying motor-unit discharge times, and imposing various levels of motor-unit synchronization. The output (EMG and force) was simulated at 11 levels of excitation, ranging from 5 to 100% of maximum. To synchronize motor-unit activity, selected motor-unit discharge times were adjusted; however, the number of motor units recruited and the average discharge rate of each unit was constant across synchronization conditions for a given level of excitation. Two levels of synchronization were imposed on the discharge times: a moderate and a high level, which approximated the experimentally observed range of motor-unit synchronization. The moderate level of synchrony caused the average EMG to increase by ∼65%, whereas the high level caused a 130% increase in the EMG with respect to the no-synchrony condition. Neither synchrony condition influenced the magnitude of the average force. However, motor-unit synchronization did increase the amplitude of the fluctuations in the simulated force, especially at intermediate levels of excitation. In conclusion, motor-unit synchronization increased the amplitude of the average rectified EMG and decreased the steadiness of the force exerted by the muscle in simulated contractions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle
Rack, P. M. H., & Westbury, D. R. (1969) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008923 · Cited by 1,144
Models of recruitment and rate coding organization in motor-unit pools.
Fuglevand, A. J., Winter, D. A., & Patla, A. E. (1993) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1993.70.6.2470 · Cited by 988
Van Cutsem, M., Duchateau, J., & Hainaut, K. (1998) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.295by.x · Cited by 777
McAuley, J. H., Rothwell, J. C., & Marsden, C. D. (1997) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/pl00005662 · Cited by 285
Motor unit discharge and force tremor in skill- and strength-trained individuals
Semmler, J. G., & Nordstrom, M. A. (1998) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s002210050316 · Cited by 237
Comparison of electromyogram spectra with force spectra during human elbow tremor.
Matthews, P. B., & Muir, R. B. (1980) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013254 · Cited by 70
Hömberg, V, Reiners, K., Hefter, H., & Freund, H.-J. (1986) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(86)90087-8 · Cited by 35 · cited 1×
“These spectra were similar to those observed experimentally (Homberg et al. 1986; Matthews and Muir 1980).”
Result
Cited by
The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG
Farina, D., Merletti, R., & Enoka, R. M. (2004) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01070.2003 · Cited by 1,573
Self-citationHeckman, C. J., & Enoka, R. M. (2012) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c100087 · Cited by 414
Self-citationTraining adaptations in the behavior of human motor units
Duchateau, J., Semmler, J. G., & Enoka, R. M. (2006) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00543.2006 · Cited by 354
Self-citationNeuromuscular Performance of Explosive Power Athletes versus Untrained Individuals
TILLIN, N. A., JIMENEZ-REYES, P., PAIN, M. T. G., & FOLLAND, J. P. (2010) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3181be9c7e · Cited by 284
Andersen, L. L., Andersen, J. L., Magnusson, S. P., Suetta, C., Madsen, J. L., Christensen, L. R., & Aagaard, P. (2005) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00091.2005 · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Yao, W., Fuglevand, R. J., & Enoka, R. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 441-452
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2220146336
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 17.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motor-Unit Synchronization Increases EMG Amplitude and Decreases Force Steadiness of Simulated Contractions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.2000.83.1.441
- The paper
- Yao, W., Fuglevand, R. J., & Enoka, R. M. (2000). Motor-Unit Synchronization Increases EMG Amplitude and Decreases Force Steadiness of Simulated Contractions. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2000.83.1.441
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.