Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 566

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Contribution of Nav1.8 Sodium Channels to Action Potential Electrogenesis in DRG Neurons

Renganathan, Muthukrishnan, Cummins, Theodore R., Waxman, Stephen G.·2001·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

C-type dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons can generate tetrodotoxin-resistant (TTX-R) sodium-dependent action potentials. However, multiple sodium channels are expressed in these neurons, and the molecular identity of the TTX-R sodium channels that contribute to action potential production in these neurons has not been established. In this study, we used current-clamp recordings to compare action potential electrogenesis in Na v 1.8 (+/+) and (−/−) small DRG neurons maintained for 2–8 h in vitro to examine the role of sodium channel Na v 1.8 (α-SNS) in action potential electrogenesis. Although there was no significant difference in resting membrane potential, input resistance, current threshold, or voltage threshold in Na v 1.8 (+/+) and (−/−) DRG neurons, there were significant differences in action potential electrogenesis. Most Na v 1.8 (+/+) neurons generate all-or-none action potentials, whereas most of Na v 1.8 (−/−) neurons produce smaller graded responses. The peak of the response was significantly reduced in Na v 1.8 (−/−) neurons [31.5 ± 2.2 (SE) mV] compared with Na v 1.8 (+/+) neurons (55.0 ± 4.3 mV). The maximum rise slope was 84.7 ± 11.2 mV/ms in Na v 1.8 (+/+) neurons, significantly faster than in Na v 1.8 (−/−) neurons where it was 47.2 ± 1.3 mV/ms. Calculations based on the action potential overshoot in Na v 1.8 (+/+) and (−/−) neurons, following blockade of Ca 2+ currents, indicate that Na v 1.8 contributes a substantial fraction (80–90%) of the inward membrane current that flows during the rising phase of the action potential. We found that fast TTX-sensitive Na+ channels can produce all-or-none action potentials in some Na v 1.8 (−/−) neurons but, presumably as a result of steady-state inactivation of these channels, electrogenesis in Na v 1.8 (−/−) neurons is more sensitive to membrane depolarization than in Na v 1.8 (+/+) neurons, and, in the absence of Na v 1.8, is attenuated with even modest depolarization. These observations indicate that Na v 1.8 contributes substantially to action potential electrogenesis in C-type DRG neurons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.2001.86.2.629

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 566

Metadata

Authors
Renganathan, M., Cummins, T. R., & Waxman, S. G.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2001-08-01
Volume
86
Issue
2
Pages
629-640
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W40340874
Cited by
566
References
0
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of Nav1.8 Sodium Channels to Action Potential Electrogenesis in DRG Neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.2001.86.2.629
The paper
Renganathan, M., Cummins, T. R., & Waxman, S. G. (2001). Contribution of Nav1.8 Sodium Channels to Action Potential Electrogenesis in DRG Neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2001.86.2.629

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.