The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feature Analysis of Natural Sounds in the Songbird Auditory Forebrain
Open accessAbstract
Although understanding the processing of natural sounds is an important goal in auditory neuroscience, relatively little is known about the neural coding of these sounds. Recently we demonstrated that the spectral temporal receptive field (STRF), a description of the stimulus-response function of auditory neurons, could be derived from responses to arbitrary ensembles of complex sounds including vocalizations. In this study, we use this method to investigate the auditory processing of natural sounds in the birdsong system. We obtain neural responses from several regions of the songbird auditory forebrain to a large ensemble of bird songs and use these data to calculate the STRFs, which are the best linear model of the spectral-temporal features of sound to which auditory neurons respond. We find that these neurons respond to a wide variety of features in songs ranging from simple tonal components to more complex spectral-temporal structures such as frequency sweeps and multi-peaked frequency stacks. We quantify spectral and temporal characteristics of these features by extracting several parameters from the STRFs. Moreover, we assess the linearity versus nonlinearity of encoding by quantifying the quality of the predictions of the neural responses to songs obtained using the STRFs. Our results reveal successively complex functional stages of song analysis by neurons in the auditory forebrain. When we map the properties of auditory forebrain neurons, as characterized by the STRF parameters, onto conventional anatomical subdivisions of the auditory forebrain, we find that although some properties are shared across different subregions, the distribution of several parameters is suggestive of hierarchical processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model of human visual-motion sensing
Watson, A. B., & Ahumada, A. J. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.000322 · Cited by 1,170
Cited by
A Hierarchy of Time-Scales and the Brain
Kiebel, S. J., Daunizeau, J., & Friston, K. J. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000209 · Cited by 694
A role for descending auditory cortical projections in songbird vocal learning
Mandelblat-Cerf, Y., Las, L., Denisenko, N., & Fee, M. S. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.02152 · Cited by 117
Neural representation of spectral and temporal information in speech
Young, E. D. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2151 · Cited by 104
Evaluating theories of bird song learning: implications for future directions
D., M. (2002) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00359-002-0351-5 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Sen, K., Theunissen, F. E., & Doupe, A. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2001-09-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1445-1458
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1572940307
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.