Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beta-Range EEG-EMG Coherence With Isometric Compensation for Increasing Modulated Low-Level Forces

Chakarov, Vihren, Naranjo, José Raúl, Schulte-Mönting, Jürgen, Omlor, Wolfgang, Huethe, Frank, Kristeva, Rumyana·2009·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Corticomuscular synchronization has been shown to occur in beta (15–30 Hz) and gamma range (30–45 Hz) during isometric compensation of static and dynamic (periodically modulated) low-level forces, respectively. However, it is still unknown to what extent these synchronization processes in beta and gamma range are modified with increasing modulated force. We addressed this question by investigating the corticomuscular coherence (CMC) between the electroencephalogram (EEG) and electromyogram (EMG) from the first dorsal interosseus muscle (FDI) as well as the cortical and muscular spectral power during a visuomotor task where different levels of a dynamic (modulated) force were used. Seven healthy right-handed female subjects compensated dynamic forces at 8, 16, and 24% of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) isometrically with their right index finger. Under the three conditions investigated, we found a broad-band CMC comprising both beta and gamma range and peaking at ∼22 Hz within the beta band. This broad-band coherence increased linearly with higher force level. A separate analysis of the gamma range CMC did not show significant modulation of the CMC by the force levels. EEG and EMG spectral power did not show any significant difference among the three force conditions. Our results favor the view that the function of beta range CMC is not specific for low-level static forces only. The sensorimotor system may resort to stronger and also broader beta-range CMC to generate stable corticospinal interaction during increased force level, as well as when compensating for dynamic modulated forces. This finding re-enforces the importance of the beta-range EEG-EMG coherence in sensorimotor integration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.91095.2008

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Chakarov, V., Naranjo, J. R., Schulte-Mönting, J., Omlor, W., Huethe, F., & Kristeva, R.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2009-08
Volume
102
Issue
2
Pages
1115-1120
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2052834884
Cited by
166
References
3
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beta-Range EEG-EMG Coherence With Isometric Compensation for Increasing Modulated Low-Level Forces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.91095.2008
The paper
Chakarov, V., Naranjo, J. R., Schulte-Mönting, J., Omlor, W., Huethe, F., & Kristeva, R. (2009). Beta-Range EEG-EMG Coherence With Isometric Compensation for Increasing Modulated Low-Level Forces. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.91095.2008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.