Cited by 114Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Running Changes the Brain: the Long and the Short of It

Open access
Vivar, Carmen, van Praag, Henriette·2017·Physiology

Abstract

Exercise is a simple intervention that profoundly benefits cognition. In rodents, running increases neurogenesis in the hippocampus, a brain area important for memory. We describe the dynamic changes in new neuron number and afferent connections throughout their maturation. We highlight the effects of exercise on the neurotransmitter systems involved, with a focus on the role of glutamate and acetylcholine in the initial development of new neurons in the adult brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/physiol.00017.2017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In rodents, chronic exercise enhances hippocampal synaptic plasticity, adult neurogenesis, neurotrophin levels, and memory function.

    “Chronic exercise in rodents also enhances hippocampal synaptic plasticity, adult neurogenesis and neurotrophin levels, as well as memory function147.”

    From Exerkines in health, resilience and disease (2022) · cites this paper as [147]

  • In rodents, voluntary wheel running increases the number of new hippocampal neurons, enhances morphological maturation such as dendritic branching and spine density, and alters the circuitry of adult-born neurons.

    “In addition, voluntary wheel running in rodents increases the number of new hippocampal neurons, enhances morphological maturation, such as dendritic branching and spine density, and alters the circuitry of adult-born neurons147.”

    From Exerkines in health, resilience and disease (2022) · cites this paper as [147]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 157 · Cited by 114

Authors
Vivar, C., & van Praag, H.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MX)
  • Neuroplasticity and Behavior Unit, Laboratory of Neurosciences, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland
Venue
Physiology
Published
2017-11
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
410-424
ISSN
  • 0886-1714 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-9213
  • 1548-9221
OpenAlex
W2763780083
Cited by
114
References
157
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (National Council of Science and Technology, Mexico) (INFR‐2016 268247)
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging) (IRP)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
running, physical activity, hippocampal neurogenesis, adult neurogenesis, afferent connections, glutamate, acetylcholine, neurotransmitter systems, memory, cognitive function
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Humans, Neurons, Physical Conditioning, Animal, Running, Exercise, Neurotransmitter Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review