Cited by 91Comparative Animal Anatomy StudiesPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Digestive Adaptations of Aerial Lifestyles

Open access
Price, Edwin R., Brun, Antonio, Caviedes-Vidal, Enrique, Karasov, William H.·2015·Physiology

Abstract

Flying vertebrates (birds and bats) are under selective pressure to reduce the size of the gut and the mass of the digesta it carries. Compared with similar-sized nonflying mammals, birds and bats have smaller intestines and shorter retention times. We review evidence that birds and bats have lower spare digestive capacity and partially compensate for smaller intestines with increased paracellular nutrient absorption.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/physiol.00020.2014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Special adaptations to a volant lifestyle are thought to influence GIT anatomy.

    “Other factors than diet thought to influence GIT anatomy include special adaptations to a volant [15, 21, 22] or a marine [23-25] lifestyle, or the aridity of the habitat [16, 26, 27].”
  • Volant mammals had shorter total intestines than terrestrial mammals.

    “Similar to previous findings, volant mammals had shorter total intestines than terrestrial mammals [15, 21, 22]”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Price, E. R., Brun, A., Caviedes-Vidal, E., & Karasov, W. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Laboratorio de Biología Integrativa, Instituto Multidisciplinario de Investigaciones Biológicas de San Luis, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, San Luis, Argentina; and
Corresponding author
Price, Edwin R.
Venue
Physiology
Published
2015-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
69-78
ISSN
  • 0886-1714 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-9213
  • 1548-9221
OpenAlex
W2114174240
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Universidad Nacional de San Luis
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
  • Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (CONICET)
  • Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
digestive adaptation, flight, birds, bats, gut size
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Birds, Chiroptera, Humans, Intestine, Small, Life Style, Mammals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review