Cited by 825Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Biology and FertilityReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species

Spermatogenesis: The Commitment to Meiosis

Open access
Griswold, Michael D.·2016·Physiological Reviews

Abstract

Mammalian spermatogenesis requires a stem cell pool, a period of amplification of cell numbers, the completion of reduction division to haploid cells (meiosis), and the morphological transformation of the haploid cells into spermatozoa (spermiogenesis). The net result of these processes is the production of massive numbers of spermatozoa over the reproductive lifetime of the animal. One study that utilized homogenization-resistant spermatids as the standard determined that human daily sperm production (dsp) was at 45 million per day per testis (60). For each human that means ∼1,000 sperm are produced per second. A key to this level of gamete production is the organization and architecture of the mammalian testes that results in continuous sperm production. The seemingly complex repetitious relationship of cells termed the “cycle of the seminiferous epithelium” is driven by the continuous commitment of undifferentiated spermatogonia to meiosis and the period of time required to form spermatozoa. This commitment termed the A to A1 transition requires the action of retinoic acid (RA) on the undifferentiated spermatogonia or prospermatogonia. In stages VII to IX of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium, Sertoli cells and germ cells are influenced by pulses of RA. These pulses of RA move along the seminiferous tubules coincident with the spermatogenic wave, presumably undergoing constant synthesis and degradation. The RA pulse then serves as a trigger to commit undifferentiated progenitor cells to the rigidly timed pathway into meiosis and spermatid differentiation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/physrev.00013.2015

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Griswold, M. D.
Affiliations
Washington State University (US)
Corresponding author
Griswold, Michael D.
Venue
Physiological Reviews
Published
2016-01
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
1-17
ISSN
  • 0031-9333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1210
OpenAlex
W2191459521
Cited by
825
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 105 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiological Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (U5442454)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 10808, U54HD042454, R01HD010808)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Keywords
spermatogenesis, meiosis, spermiogenesis, spermatogonia, prospermatogonia, retinoic acid, Sertoli cells, spermatid differentiation, daily sperm production, germ cell differentiation
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Male, Meiosis, Morphogenesis, Spermatogenesis, Spermatozoa, Stem Cells, Testis, Tretinoin, Signal Transduction, Cell Lineage, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review