Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 868

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 300 of the 300 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Background of Leak K+Currents: Two-Pore Domain Potassium Channels

Enyedi, Péter, Czirják, Gábor·2010·Physiological Reviews
DOI 10.1152/physrev.00029.2009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Two-pore domain K+(K 2P) channels give rise to leak (also called background) K+currents. The well-known role of background K+currents is to stabilize the negative resting membrane potential and counterbalance depolarization. However, it has become apparent in the past decade (during the detailed examination of the cloned and corresponding native K 2P channel types) that this primary hyperpolarizing action is not performed passively. The K 2P channels are regulated by a wide variety of voltage-independent factors. Basic physicochemical parameters (e.g., pH, temperature, membrane stretch) and also several intracellular signaling pathways substantially and specifically modulate the different members of the six K 2P channel subfamilies (TWIK, TREK, TASK, TALK, THIK, and TRESK). The deep implication in diverse physiological processes, the circumscribed expression pattern of the different channels, and the interesting pharmacological profile brought the K 2P channel family into the spotlight. In this review, we focus on the physiological roles of K 2P channels in the most extensively investigated cell types, with special emphasis on the molecular mechanisms of channel regulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/physrev.00029.2009

Cites

300 of 300 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–300 of 300

Cited by

See all 868

Metadata

Authors
Enyedi, P., & Czirják, G.
Venue
Physiological Reviews
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Published
2010-04
Volume
90
Issue
2
Pages
559-605
ISSN
  • 0031-9333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1210
DOI
10.1152/physrev.00029.2009
OpenAlex
W2131597783
Cited by
868
References
300
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.