The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Functional specialization of different hepatocyte populations
Abstract
Hepatocytes from the periportal (afferent) and perivenous (efferent) zones of the liver parenchyma differ in their enzyme content and subcellular structures and thus have different metabolic capacities. Therefore the model of metabolic zonation proposes a functional specialization for the two zones: 1) oxidative energy metabolism with beta-oxidation, amino acid catabolism, ureagenesis, gluconeogenesis for the synthesis of both glucose and glycogen, cholesterol synthesis, bile formation, and protective metabolism are predominantly located in the periportal zone; 2) glycolysis, glycogen synthesis from glucose, liponeogenesis, ketogenesis, glutamine formation, and xenobiotic metabolism are preferentially situated in the perivenous zone. The input of humoral and nervous signals into the two zones is different. During passage of blood through the liver acinus, concentration gradients of oxygen, substrates, and hormones are established; the nerve densities in the two zones seem to be different. The different expression of the genome in upstream and downstream hepatocytes can be caused among other factors by the zonal gradients in oxygen and hormone concentrations. The functional specialization of the different hepatocyte populations is especially well documented for carbohydrate, amino acid, ammonia, and xenobiotic metabolism as well as for bile formation by a number of different approaches. Zonal flux differences were calculated from enzyme and metabolite distributions measured in vivo. They were observed in periportal- and perivenous-like hepatocytes in cell culture and in hepatocyte populations enriched in periportal and perivenous cells. They were detected also during ortho-and retrograde liver perfusion and finally by noninvasive techniques, using surface micro-light guides and miniature oxygen electrodes. The peculiar zonal hepatotoxicity of many xenobiotics can be explained at least in part by the enzymatic and fine-structural hepatocellular heterogeneity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Organogenesis and development of the liver
Si-Tayeb, K., Lemaigre, F. P., & Duncan, S. A. (2010) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.01.011 · Cited by 800
Metabolic zonation of the liver: Regulation and implications for liver function
Gebhardt, R. (1992) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/0163-7258(92)90055-5 · Cited by 607
Metabolic zonation of the liver: The oxygen gradient revisited
Kietzmann, T. (2017) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2017.01.012 · Cited by 499
Hybrid Periportal Hepatocytes Regenerate the Injured Liver without Giving Rise to Cancer
Font-Burgada, J., Shalapour, S., Ramaswamy, S., Hsueh, B., Rossell, D., Umemura, A., Taniguchi, K., Nakagawa, H., Valasek, M. A., Ye, L., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.026 · Cited by 486
Spatial heterogeneity in the mammalian liver
Ben-Moshe, S., & Itzkovitz, S. (2019) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-019-0134-x · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Jungermann, K., & Katz, N.
- Venue
- Physiological Reviews
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1989-07-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 708-764
- ISSN
- 0031-9333 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1210
- OpenAlex
- W2278793656
- Cited by
- 653
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional specialization of different hepatocyte populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/physrev.1989.69.3.708
- The paper
- Jungermann, K., & Katz, N. (1989). Functional specialization of different hepatocyte populations. Physiological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1989.69.3.708
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.