Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 476

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gastroduodenal mucosal protection

Allen, A., Flemstrom, G., Garner, A., Kivilaakso, E.·1993·Physiological Reviews

Abstract

The barrier that protects the undamaged gastroduodenal mucosa from autodigestion by gastric juice is a dynamic multicomponent system. The major elements of this barrier are the adherent mucus gel layer, which is percolated by the HCO3- secretion from the underlying epithelial cells; the epithelial layer itself, which provides a permeability barrier and can rapidly repair superficial damage by a process of cell migration referred to as reepithelization or restitution; and a specially adapted vasculature, which provides a supply of HCO3- for transcellular transport and/or diffusion into the mucus layer. Passive diffusion of intestinal HCO3- into the lumen is particularly important when there is superficial damage resulting in increased leakiness of the mucosal epithelium. The process of reepithelization occurs by the migration of performed cells from gastric pits or duodenal crypts. This process is quite distinct from the wound healing and associated inflammatory response that accompany more severe injury or chronic damage. The adherent mucus gel acts as a physical barrier against luminal pepsin and provides a stable unstirred layer that supports surface neutralization of acid by mucosal HCO3-. Surface neutralization by mucosal HCO3- provides a major mechanism of protection against acid in the proximal duodenum. In the stomach, where luminal acidity can fall to around pH 1, other mechanisms of protection must exist, since the surface pH gradient is reported to collapse when luminal H+ exceeds approximately 10 mM. This collapse of the surface pH gradients may reflect, at least in part, that such studies have been mostly performed on non-acid-secreting mucosa where the supply of HCO3- to the interstitium from the parietal cells will be reduced. However, because the gastric mucosa can withstand prolonged exposure to acid without apparent damage, this implies an intrinsic resistance of the epithelial apical surface. This is amply illustrated within the gastric glands that do not secrete mucus and HCO3- yet are exposed to undiluted pepsin and an isotonic solution of HCl. Bicarbonate and mucus secretions together with mucosal blood flow are under paracrine, endocrine, and neural control. The rate of reepithelialization will depend on local chemotactic factors, adhesion mechanisms, and the creation of an acid/pepsin/irritant-free environment under a protective gelatinous or mucoid cap. If optimal conditions are met, then the rate of reepithelialization appears to depend primarily on the intrinsic properties of the migrating cells themselves rather than control by exogenous mediators.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/physrev.1993.73.4.823

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 476

Metadata

Authors
Allen, A., Flemstrom, G., Garner, A., & Kivilaakso, E.
Venue
Physiological Reviews
Published
1993-10-01
Volume
73
Issue
4
Pages
823-857
ISSN
  • 0031-9333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1210
OpenAlex
W2260255165
Cited by
476
References
0
FWCI
13.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gastroduodenal mucosal protection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/physrev.1993.73.4.823
The paper
Allen, A., Flemstrom, G., Garner, A., & Kivilaakso, E. (1993). Gastroduodenal mucosal protection. Physiological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1993.73.4.823

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.