Cited by 1,050Advanced Drug Delivery SystemsNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery

Rapid transport of large polymeric nanoparticles in fresh undiluted human mucus

Open access
Lai, Samuel K., O'Hanlon, D. Elizabeth, Harrold, Suzanne, Man, Stan T., Wang, Ying-Ying, Cone, Richard, Hanes, Justin·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Nanoparticles larger than the reported mesh-pore size range (10–200 nm) in mucus have been thought to be much too large to undergo rapid diffusional transport through mucus barriers. However, large nanoparticles are preferred for higher drug encapsulation efficiency and the ability to provide sustained delivery of a wider array of drugs. We used high-speed multiple-particle tracking to quantify transport rates of individual polymeric particles of various sizes and surface chemistries in samples of fresh human cervicovaginal mucus. Both the mucin concentration and viscoelastic properties of these cervicovaginal samples are similar to those in many other human mucus secretions. Unexpectedly, we found that large nanoparticles, 500 and 200 nm in diameter, if coated with polyethylene glycol, diffused through mucus with an effective diffusion coefficient ( D eff ) only 4- and 6-fold lower than that for the same particles in water (at time scale τ = 1 s). In contrast, for smaller but otherwise identical 100-nm coated particles, D eff was 200-fold lower in mucus than in water. For uncoated particles 100–500 nm in diameter, D eff was 2,400- to 40,000-fold lower in mucus than in water. Much larger fractions of the 100-nm particles were immobilized or otherwise hindered by mucus than the large 200- to 500-nm particles. Thus, in contrast to the prevailing belief, these results demonstrate that large nanoparticles, if properly coated, can rapidly penetrate physiological human mucus, and they offer the prospect that large nanoparticles can be used for mucosal drug delivery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0608611104

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improved tissue uptake of PEGylated nanoparticles may be attributed to their higher diffusivity through the mucous layer.

    “Improved tissue uptake of PEGylated nanoparticles may be attributed to their higher diffusivity through the mucous layer-an observation shown using multiple particle tracking experiments by the Hanes lab 24 .”

    From Nanotechnology approaches for global infectious diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [24]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [23]Carlstedt I, Sheehan JK. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1989;43:289–316. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [24]Cone R. In: Mucosal Immunology. 2nd Ed. Ogra PL, Mestecky J, Lamm ME, Strober W, Bienenstock J, McGhee JR, editors. San Diego: Academic; 1999. pp. 43–64. [Google Scholar]
  3. [30]Langer R. Nature. 1998;392:5–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. [35]Norris DA, Sinko PJ. J Appl Polym Sci. 1997;63:1481–1492. [Google Scholar]
  5. [36]Szentkuti L. J Controlled Release. 1997;46:233–242. [Google Scholar]
  6. [37]Ron N, Thies C. Proc Controlled Rel Soc. 1998;25:376–377. [Google Scholar]
  7. [59]Fu J, Fiegel J, Hanes J. Macromolecules. 2004;37:7174–7180. [Google Scholar]
  8. [60]Suh J, Choy KL, Lai SK, Suk JS, Tang B, Prabhu S, Hanes J. Int J Nanomed. 2007 in press. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. [63]Mason TG, Ganesan K, vanZanten JH, Wirtz D, Kuo SC. Phys Rev Lett. 1997;79:3282–3285. [Google Scholar]
  10. [64]Suk JS, Suh J, Lai SK, Hanes J. Exp Biol Med. 2007 in press. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lai, S. K., O'Hanlon, D. E., Harrold, S., Man, S. T., Wang, Y.-Y., Cone, R., & Hanes, J.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Biophysics and
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-01-30
Volume
104
Issue
5
Pages
1482-1487
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2102002215
Cited by
1,050
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 47
FWCI
23.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Johns Hopkins University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Keywords
polymeric nanoparticles, mucus transport, cervicovaginal mucus, diffusion coefficient, particle size effects, polyethylene glycol coating, mucin, mucus viscoelasticity, particle immobilization, mucosal drug delivery, multiple particle tracking
MeSH terms
Biological Transport, Cervix Mucus, Diffusion, Drug Carriers, Female, Humans, Mucus, Particle Size, Polyethylene Glycols, Polymers, Time Factors, Water, Drug Delivery Systems, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review