The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanics of the Mammalian Cochlea
Open accessAbstract
In mammals, environmental sounds stimulate the auditory receptor, the cochlea, via vibrations of the stapes, the innermost of the middle ear ossicles. These vibrations produce displacement waves that travel on the elongated and spirally wound basilar membrane (BM). As they travel, waves grow in amplitude, reaching a maximum and then dying out. The location of maximum BM motion is a function of stimulus frequency, with high-frequency waves being localized to the “base” of the cochlea (near the stapes) and low-frequency waves approaching the “apex” of the cochlea. Thus each cochlear site has a characteristic frequency (CF), to which it responds maximally. BM vibrations produce motion of hair cell stereocilia, which gates stereociliar transduction channels leading to the generation of hair cell receptor potentials and the excitation of afferent auditory nerve fibers. At the base of the cochlea, BM motion exhibits a CF-specific and level-dependent compressive nonlinearity such that responses to low-level, near-CF stimuli are sensitive and sharply frequency-tuned and responses to intense stimuli are insensitive and poorly tuned. The high sensitivity and sharp-frequency tuning, as well as compression and other nonlinearities (two-tone suppression and intermodulation distortion), are highly labile, indicating the presence in normal cochleae of a positive feedback from the organ of Corti, the “cochlear amplifier.” This mechanism involves forces generated by the outer hair cells and controlled, directly or indirectly, by their transduction currents. At the apex of the cochlea, nonlinearities appear to be less prominent than at the base, perhaps implying that the cochlear amplifier plays a lesser role in determining apical mechanical responses to sound. Whether at the base or the apex, the properties of BM vibration adequately account for most frequency-specific properties of the responses to sound of auditory nerve fibers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neural Processing of Amplitude-Modulated Sounds
JORIS, P. X., SCHREINER, C. E., & REES, A. (2004) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2003 · Cited by 938
Cochlear Outer Hair Cell Motility
Ashmore, J. (2008) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00044.2006 · Cited by 503
Prestin-Based Outer Hair Cell Motility Is Necessary for Mammalian Cochlear Amplification
Dallos, P., Wu, X., Cheatham, M. A., Gao, J., Zheng, J., Anderson, C. T., Jia, S., Wang, X., Cheng, W. H. Y., Sengupta, S., et al. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.02.028 · Cited by 414
Knipper, M., Van Dijk, P., Nunes, I., Rüttiger, L., & Zimmermann, U. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.08.002 · Cited by 309
A review of hyperacusis and future directions: part II. Measurement, mechanisms, and treatment
Pienkowski, M., Tyler, R. S., Roncancio, E. R., Jun, H. J., Brozoski, T., Dauman, N., Coelho, C. B., Andersson, G., Keiner, A. J., Cacace, A. T., et al. (2014) · American Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1044/2014_aja-13-0037 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Robles, L., & Ruggero, M. A.
- Venue
- Physiological Reviews
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2001-07-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1305-1352
- ISSN
- 0031-9333 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1210
- OpenAlex
- W2137453923
- Cited by
- 1,476
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanics of the Mammalian Cochlea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/physrev.2001.81.3.1305
- The paper
- Robles, L., & Ruggero, M. A. (2001). Mechanics of the Mammalian Cochlea. Physiological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.2001.81.3.1305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.